Access profile

Profile of ideal applicant:

• Architects
• Technical architects
• Engineers in the construction sector: civil, roadway, canal and port, industrial, etc.

Profile of second-best applicant:

• Archaeologists
• Historians
• Economists
• Lawyers
• Scientists

The master’s programmes that lead into this doctoral programme are those offered by the UPC in the fields of architecture and construction. In cases in which applicants have completed other official master’s-level study programmes that provide advanced specialised or multidisciplinary training, at this or another university, and are focused on enabling students to complete research and professional work and are recognised as programmes that prepare students to undertake doctoral-level studies, the applicants will have to provide additional information about the corresponding study programme in order to decide whether or not any additional coursework will have to be completed, according to current legal limits (see the “Bridging Courses” section).

Output profile

Doctoral candidates who complete a doctoral degree will have acquired the following competencies, which are needed to carry out quality research (Royal Decree 99/2011, of 28 January, which regulates official doctoral studies):

a) A systematic understanding of the field of study and a mastery of the research skills and methods related to the field.
b) An ability to conceive, design or create, put into practice and adopt a substantial process of research or creation.
c) An ability to contribute to pushing back the frontiers of knowledge through original research.
d) A capacity for critical analysis and an ability to assess and summarise new and complex ideas.
e) An ability to communicate with the academic and scientific community and with society in general as regards their fields of knowledge in the manner and languages that are typical of the international scientific community to which they belong.
f) An ability to foster scientific, technological, social, artistic and cultural progress in academic and professional contexts within a knowledge-based society.

The award of a doctoral degree must equip the graduate for work in a variety of settings, especially those requiring creativity and innovation. Doctoral graduates must have at least acquired the personal skills needed to:

a) Develop in contexts in which there is little specific information.
b) Find the key questions that must be answered to solve a complex problem.
c) Design, create, develop and undertake original, innovative projects in their field.
d) Work as part of a team and independently in an international or multidisciplinary context.
e) Integrate knowledge, deal with complexity and make judgements with limited information.
f) Offer criticism on and intellectually defend solutions.

Finally, with respect to competencies, doctoral students must:
a) have acquired advanced knowledge at the frontier of their discipline and demonstrated, in the context of internationally recognised scientific research, a deep, detailed and well-grounded understanding of theoretical and practical issues and scientific methodology in one or more research fields;
b) have made an original and significant contribution to scientific research in their field of expertise that has been recognised as such by the international scientific community;
c) have demonstrated that they are capable of designing a research project that serves as a framework for carrying out a critical analysis and assessment of imprecise situations, in which they are able to apply their contributions, expertise and working method to synthesise new and complex ideas that yield a deeper knowledge of the research context in which they work;
d) have developed sufficient autonomy to set up, manage and lead innovative research teams and projects and scientific collaborations (both national and international) within their subject area, in multidisciplinary contexts and, where appropriate, with a substantial element of knowledge transfer;
e) have demonstrated that they are able to carry out their research activity in a socially responsible manner and with scientific integrity;
f) have demonstrated, within their specific scientific context, that they are able to make cultural, social or technological advances and promote innovation in all areas within a knowledge-based society;
g) have demonstrated that they are able to participate in scientific discussions at the international level in their field of expertise and disseminate the results of their research activity to audiences of all kinds.

Number of places

12

Duration of studies and dedication regime

Duration
The maximum period of study for full-time doctoral studies is three years, counted from the date of admission to the programme to the date of submission of the doctoral thesis. The academic committee of the doctoral programme may authorise a doctoral candidate to pursue doctoral studies on a part-time basis. In this case, the maximum period of study is five years, counting from the date of admission to the programme to the date of submission of the doctoral thesis. For calculating these periods, the date of admission is considered to be the date of the first enrolment for tutorials, and the date of submission the moment in which the Doctoral School officially deposits the doctoral thesis.

For full-time doctoral candidates, the minimum period of study is two years, counted from the date of an applicant's admission to the programme until the date on which the doctoral thesis is deposited; for part-time doctoral candidates it is four years. When there are justified grounds for doing so, and the thesis supervisor and academic tutor have given their authorisation, doctoral candidates may request that the academic committee of their doctoral programme exempt them from the minimum period of study requirement.

The calculation of periods of study will not include periods of absence due to illness, pregnancy or any other reason provided for in the regulations in force. Students who find themselves in any of these circumstances must notify the academic committee of the doctoral programme, which, where appropriate, must inform the Doctoral School. Doctoral candidates may also temporarily withdraw from the programme for up to one year, and this period may be extended for an additional year. Doctoral candidates who wish to interrupt their studies must submit a justified request to the academic committee of the doctoral programme, which will decide whether or not to approve the request. Each programme will establish conditions for readmission to doctoral studies.

Extension
If full-time doctoral candidates have not applied to deposit their thesis by the end of the three-year period of study, the academic committee of the programme may authorise an extension of up to one year. In exceptional circumstances, a further one-year extension may be granted, subject to the conditions established by the corresponding doctoral programme. In the case of part-time doctoral candidates, an extension of two years may be authorised. In both cases, in exceptional circumstances a further one-year extension may be granted by the Doctoral School's Standing Committee, upon the submission of a reasoned application by the academic committee of the doctoral programme.

Dismissal from the doctoral programme
A doctoral candidate may be dismissed from a doctoral programme for the following reasons:

• The doctoral candidate submitting a justified application to withdraw from the programme.
• The maximum period of study and of extensions thereof ending.
• The doctoral candidate not having enrolled every academic year (unless he or she has been authorised to temporarily withdraw).
• The doctoral candidate failing two consecutive assessments.
• The doctoral candidate having disciplinary proceedings filed against him or her that rule that he or she must be dismissed from the UPC.

Dismissal from the programme implies that doctoral candidates cannot continue studying at the UPC and the closing of their academic record. This notwithstanding, they may apply to the academic committee of the programme for readmission and the committee must reevaluate them in accordance with the criteria established in the regulations.

Organization

• Lacasta Palacio, Ana Maria

• Claramunt Blanes, Jose
• Garcia Carrera, David
• Gonzalez Barroso, Josep Maria
• Lacasta Palacio, Ana Maria
• Muros Alcojor, Adrian
• Rosell Amigo, Joan Ramon
• Zamora Mestre, Joan Lluis

• Department of Architectural Technology (PROMOTORA)

Secretary of the doctoral programmes in Architecture
Tel.: 934 011 875
Secretariadoctorat.utgab@upc.edu

Access profile

Profile of ideal applicant:

• Architects
• Technical architects
• Engineers in the construction sector: civil, roadway, canal and port, industrial, etc.

Profile of second-best applicant:

• Archaeologists
• Historians
• Economists
• Lawyers
• Scientists

The master’s programmes that lead into this doctoral programme are those offered by the UPC in the fields of architecture and construction. In cases in which applicants have completed other official master’s-level study programmes that provide advanced specialised or multidisciplinary training, at this or another university, and are focused on enabling students to complete research and professional work and are recognised as programmes that prepare students to undertake doctoral-level studies, the applicants will have to provide additional information about the corresponding study programme in order to decide whether or not any additional coursework will have to be completed, according to current legal limits (see the “Bridging Courses” section).

Access requirements

Applicants must hold a Spanish bachelor’s degree or equivalent and a Spanish master’s degree or equivalent, provided they have completed a minimum of 300 ECTS credits on the two degrees (Royal Decree 43/2015, of 2 February)

In addition, the following may apply:

• Holders of an official degree awarded by a university in Spain or any other country in the European Higher Education Area, pursuant to the provisions of Article 16 of Royal Decree 1393/2007, of 29 October, which establishes official university course regulations, who have completed a minimum of 300 ECTS credits on official university degrees, of which at least 60 must be at the master's degree level.
• Holders of an official Spanish bachelor’s degree comprising at least 300 credits, as provided for by EU regulations. Holder of degrees of this kind must complete bridging courses unless the curriculum of the bachelor’s degree in question included research training credits equivalent in value to those which would be earned on a master's degree.
• Holders of an official university qualification who, having passed the entrance examination for specialised medical training, have completed at least two years of a training course leading to an official degree in a health-sciences specialisation.
• Holders of a degree issued under a foreign education system. In these cases, homologation is not required, but the UPC must verify that the degree certifies a level of training equivalent to an official Spanish master's degree and qualifies the holder for admission to doctoral studies in the country where it was issued. Admission on this basis does not imply homologation of the foreign degree or its recognition for any purpose other than admission to doctoral studies.
• Holders of a Spanish doctoral qualification issued under previous university regulations.

Note 1: Doctoral studies entrance regulations for holders of an undergraduate degree awarded before the introduction of the EHEA (CG 47/02 2014)

Note 2: Governing Council Decision 64/2014, which approves the procedure and criteria for assessing the fulfilment of academic admission requirements for doctoral studies by holders of non-homologated foreign degrees (CG 25/03 2014)

Admission criteria and merits assessment

In order to study in a doctoral programme, the programme’s Academic Committee must first grant applicants admission. Specific admission requirements are as follows:

Training complements

Bridging courses will be defined based on the aforementioned applicant profiles, and are as follows:

Ideal applicant: university professionals who habitually participate in the technical processes involved with architecture, building construction and urbanism, as architects, surveyors or engineers in the construction sector.

These professionals will not be required to take bridging courses if they have previously completed one of the master’s programmes that lead up to this doctoral programme. Otherwise, they will have to complete the master’s-level coursework suggested by the programme’s Academic Committee.

Second-best applicant: professionals that occasionally collaborate on architectural projects, such as archaeologists, historians, economists, lawyers and scientists.

These professionals will not be required to take bridging courses if they have previously completed one of the master’s programmes that lead up to this doctoral programme. Otherwise, they will have to complete the master’s-level coursework suggested by the programme’s Academic Committee.

Candidates who, while carrying out their research plan, show a lack of specific instrumental training, may be required by their supervisor to complete additional educational and/or training activities from the list of courses offered by the University for doctoral candidates, in line with the UPC’s Doctoral School.

Enrolment period for new doctoral students

Candidates’ first enrolment will take place during the time indicated on the admission decision.

More information at the registration section for new doctoral students

Enrolment period

In the first half of October.

More information at the general registration section

Procedure for the preparation and defense of the research plan

Doctoral candidates must submit a research plan, which will be included in their doctoral student activity report, before the end of the first year. The plan may be improved over the course of the doctoral degree. It must be endorsed by the tutor and the supervisor, and it must include the method that is to be followed and the aims of the research.

At least one of these annual assessments will include a public presentation and defence of the research plan and work done before a committee composed of three doctoral degree holders, which will be conducted in the manner determined by each academic committee. The examination committee awards a Pass or Fail mark. A Pass mark is a prerequisite for continuing on the doctoral programme. Doctoral candidates awarded a Fail mark must submit a new research plan for assessment by the academic committee of the doctoral programme within six months.

The committee assesses the research plan every year, in addition to all of the other activities in the doctoral student activity report. Doctoral candidates who are awarded two consecutive Fail marks for the research plan will be obliged to definitely withdraw from the programme.

If they change the subject of their thesis, they must submit a new research plan.

Formation activities

Activity: Tutorial.
Hours: 288.
Compulsory.

Activity: Study trips.
Hours: 80.
Optional.

Activity: Stays at businesses or with collaborators.
Hours: 480.
Optional.

Activity: Attending conferences.
Hours: 288.
Optional.

Activity: Mobility.
Hours: 480.
Optional.

Activity: Assessment based on doctoral student activity report (DAD) and research plan.
Hours: 4.
Compulsory.

Activity: Training in information skills.
Hours: 1.5
Optional.

Activity: Research methodology.
Hours: 12.
Optional.

Activity: Innovation and creativity.
Hours: 8.
Optional.

Activity: Language and communication skills.
Hours: 18.
Optional.

Activity: Workshops.

Activity: Publications.
Hours: 80.
Compulsory.
Before submitting their theses, candidates must have at least one publication.

Procedure for assignment of tutor and thesis director

The academic committee of the doctoral programme assigns a thesis supervisor to each doctoral candidate when they are admitted or enrol for the first time, taking account of the thesis supervision commitment referred to in the admission decision.

The thesis supervisor will ensure that training activities carried out by the doctoral candidate are coherent and suitable, and that the topic of the candidate’s doctoral thesis will have an impact and make a novel contribution to knowledge in the relevant field. The thesis supervisor will also guide the doctoral candidate in planning the thesis and, if necessary, tailoring it to any other projects or activities undertaken. The thesis supervisor will generally be a UPC professor or researcher who holds a doctoral degree and has documented research experience. This includes PhD-holding staff at associated schools (as determined by the Governing Council) and UPC-affiliated research institutes (in accordance with corresponding collaboration and affiliation agreements). When thesis supervisors are UPC staff members, they also act as the doctoral candidate’s tutor.

PhD holders who do not meet these criteria (as a result of their contractual relationship or the nature of the institution to which they are attached) must be approved by the UPC Doctoral School's Standing Committee in order to participate in a doctoral programme as researchers with documented research experience.

The academic committee of the doctoral programme may approve the appointment of a PhD-holding expert who is not a UPC staff member as a candidate’s thesis supervisor. In such cases, the prior authorisation of the UPC Doctoral School's Standing Committee is required. A UPC staff member who holds a doctoral degree and has documented research experience must also be proposed to act as a co-supervisor, or as the doctoral candidate’s tutor if one has not been assigned.

A thesis supervisor may step down from this role if there are justified reasons (recognised as valid by the committee) for doing so. If this occurs, the academic committee of the doctoral programme will assign the doctoral candidate a new thesis supervisor.

Provided there are justified reasons for doing so, and after hearing any relevant input from the doctoral candidate, the academic committee of the doctoral programme may assign a new thesis supervisor at any time during the period of doctoral study.

If there are academic reasons for doing so (an interdisciplinary topic, joint or international programmes, etc.) and the academic committee of the programme gives its approval, an additional thesis supervisor may be assigned. Supervisors and co-supervisors have the same responsibilities and academic recognition.

The maximum number of supervisors of a doctoral thesis is two: a supervisor and a co-supervisor.

For theses carried out under a cotutelle agreement or as part of an Industrial Doctorate, if necessary and if the agreement foresees it this maximum number of supervisors may not apply. This notwithstanding, the maximum number of supervisors belonging to the UPC is two.

More information at the PhD theses section

Permanence

The academic committee of the programme may authorise an extension of up to one year for full-time doctoral candidates who have not applied to deposit their thesis by the end of the three-year period of study, in the terms outlined in the Academic Regulations for Doctoral Studies of the Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya. In the case of part-time candidates, an extension of two years may be authorised. In both cases, in exceptional circumstances a further one-year extension may be granted by the Doctoral School's Standing Committee, upon the submission of a reasoned application by the academic committee of the doctoral programme.

A doctoral candidate may be dismissed from a doctoral programme for the following reasons:

• The doctoral candidate submitting a justified application to withdraw from the programme.
• The maximum period of study and of extensions thereof ending.
• The doctoral candidate not having enrolled every academic year (unless he or she has been authorised to temporarily withdraw).
• The doctoral candidate failing two consecutive assessments.
• The doctoral candidate having disciplinary proceedings filed against him or her that rule that he or she must be dismissed from the UPC.

Dismissal from the programme implies that doctoral candidates cannot continue studying at the UPC and the closing of their academic record. This notwithstanding, they may apply to the academic committee of the programme for readmission and the committee must reevaluate them in accordance with the criteria established in the regulations.

International Mention

The doctoral degree certificate may include International Doctorate mention. In this case, the doctoral candidate must meet the following requirements:

a) During the period of study leading to the award of the doctoral degree, the doctoral candidate must have spent at least three months at a respected higher education institution or research centre outside Spain to complete courses or do research work. The stays and activities carried out must be endorsed by the thesis supervisor and authorised by the academic committee of the programme. The candidate must provide a certifying document issued by the person responsible for the research group of the body or bodies where the stay or activity was completed. This information will be added to the doctoral student’s activity report.
b) Part of the thesis (at least the summary and conclusions) must be written and presented in one of the languages commonly used for science communication in the relevant field of knowledge, which must not be an official language of Spain. This rule does not apply to stays and reports in Spanish or to experts from Spanish-speaking countries.
c) At least two PhD-holding experts belonging to a higher education institution or research centre outside Spain must have issued officially certified reports on the thesis.
d) The thesis examination committee must have included at least one PhD-holding expert from a higher education or research institution outside Spain who was not responsible for the candidate’s stay abroad (point a) above).
e) The thesis defence must have taken place on UPC premises or, in the case of joint programmes, at the location specified in the collaboration agreement.

List of authorized thesis for defense

Last update: 28/09/2021 04:47:06.

List of lodged theses

Last update: 28/09/2021 04:31:08.

List of defended theses by year

• ARNAIZ BARRIO, BEATRIZ: Fundamentos de la morfogénesis de tensoestructuras. Membrane House
  
  Author: ARNAIZ BARRIO, BEATRIZ
  Thesis link: http://hdl.handle.net/10803/672413
  Programme: DOCTORAL DEGREE IN ARCHITECTURAL, BUILDING CONSTRUCTION AND URBANISM TECHNOLOGY
  Department: Department of Architectural Technology (TA)
  Mode: Normal
  Reading date: 30/07/2021
  Thesis director: SASTRE SASTRE, RAMON
  

  Committee:
       PRESIDENT: MONJO CARRIÓ, JUAN
       SECRETARI: GARCÍA CARRERA, DAVID
       VOCAL NO PRESENCIAL: BEGIRISTAIN MITXELENA, JON ANDONI
  Thesis abstract: The fundamental objective of this thesis is to delve into the process of generating the shape of tensioned membrane structures, from the conjunction of the theoretical foundations presented and practical experimentation, applied in the case of the Membrane House prototype.In Chapter 0, we start from the concept of light architecture associated with the current architectural context and the evolution of the profession, to transmit the need to open up the field of architecture to new ways of creating, building and living. Part of the work of this thesis consists of the study of light architecture, and specifically of textile architecture, in order to demand the recognition of this non-conventional architecture, at a professional and academic level, which is contained in the technical part of Chapter 1.The focus of this thesis seeks to emphasise the importance of the design process characteristic of tensile structures, providing with this research generative programme content, as opposed to the productive programme, of which there is more content developed today in the field of textile architecture. This is the line along which the collection of theoretical discourse references in Chapter 1 and their application to the original content in Chapter 2 is developed.In these chapters, a theoretical content is generated accompanied by practical experimentation, which can provide a basis for proposing a pedagogical programme from which textile architecture is introduced into learning and architectural practice, enhancing its dissemination and application. This will allow us to position textile architecture as a hinge for understanding new generative processes, applicable to design beyond tensile structures, and which will become part of the discursive content of architecture, as a design tool, not only as an unusual product. This content is developed in the thesis from two methodological perspectives that are constantly converging: documentary [reproductive] process and experimental [productive] process. In the structure of the thesis, these two lines are distributed throughout chapters in order to organise the content, although the aim is to point out the turning points that bring together the two axes, generating a discourse that links the practical and theoretical fields.In Chapter 3, the approach to this discourse is reinforced by means of a concrete practical experience: the process of generating the form and development of the Membrane House prototype. This prototype is the protagonist of the research because its development process has meant the consolidation of the discursive approaches to morphogeneration, and it has been a laboratory in which to experiment from the inconclusive.In Annex I, another series of practical examples are presented, which support the discourse, and which are enriching pedagogical or experimental experiences for all the participants.The transdisciplinary work, the criterion of efficiency and the search from the capacity of agency of the material are fundamental vertebrae of the path of this research, and the tensile structures gather in their process of morphogenation, calculation and construction these characteristics in an intrinsic way. The introduction of the membrane as a structural element implies starting the design process from the material, activating its potential and working with it until it finds its most efficient position in a lightweight, integrally balanced structural system. This process has been defined and nurtured through interdisciplinary research and experimentation, which in current practice, taking a further step, is interested in reverting to transdisciplinary work, among other future lines of research opened up in this thesis.Keywords: textile architecture, tensile structures, morphogenesis, structural efficiency, design process, light architecture, prototype.
  

• MIRBAGHERI, MAHSA: Urban cemetery biophilic integration for human well-being (An applied case study of Tehran, Iran)
  
  Author: MIRBAGHERI, MAHSA
  Thesis link: http://hdl.handle.net/10803/671834
  Programme: DOCTORAL DEGREE IN ARCHITECTURAL, BUILDING CONSTRUCTION AND URBANISM TECHNOLOGY
  Department: Department of Architectural Technology (TA)
  Mode: Normal
  Reading date: 25/05/2021
  Thesis director: PARDAL MARCH, CRISTINA | ROCA BLANCH, ESTANISLAO
  

  Committee:
       PRESIDENT: GARCÍA VÁZQUEZ, CARLOS
       SECRETARI: MARTI CASANOVAS, MIQUEL
       VOCAL NO PRESENCIAL: DOS SANTOS FERREIRA DA FONSECA BENTO, PEDRO JOSÉ
  Thesis abstract: Cemeteries are an ancient reality, and while their basic function has not changed, their physical layout as well as the symbolic and emotional role within our societies has undergone profound transformations over time. The Oxford dictionary literally defines cemetery as ¿A large burial ground¿. The meaning in the American heritage dictionary is similar: ¿A place for burying the dead.¿ The definitions of cemetery in both dictionaries significantly mentions the dead and dark side of these spaces. Not only these definitions but also modern zoning legislation on cemeteries deny their role as urban open public green spaces and their potential to contribute to human well-being. Decisions about cemeteries segregation follow two-dimensional land-use urban planning, without considering their relationships with other urban spaces and without a real understanding of human behavior. The usual process of urban development treats cemeteries as isolated singular function urban spaces, not as part of larger urban fabrics. This vision leads to the appearance of urban spaces without any urban design qualities. This research was conceived to investigate the main process of urban cemeteries integration with cities and human daily life by biophilic approaches (based on Iran as a case study). It has the potential to make an important contribution to both academic research and planning decisions on the roles of urban cemeteries in cities and their response to human well-being. The thesis is based on two literature review parts concerning urban design assessment and biophilic applied methods. It highlights the necessity of intervention at different scales (urban planning, urban design, architecture, and landscape design) in order to develop an integration process of cemeteries. The case study of Tehran and references to international cases lead to address the general strategies and guides of this process in detail.
  

• RAMÍREZ SÁNCHEZ, MADELIN JARONI DEL PILAR: Morteros de cac reforzados con fibras vegetales. Microestructura, evaluación físico-mecánica y durabilidad para su aplicación en materiales de construcción: Ejemplo de pavimento
  
  Author: RAMÍREZ SÁNCHEZ, MADELIN JARONI DEL PILAR
  Thesis link: http://hdl.handle.net/10803/671503
  Programme: DOCTORAL DEGREE IN ARCHITECTURAL, BUILDING CONSTRUCTION AND URBANISM TECHNOLOGY
  Department: Department of Architectural Technology (TA)
  Mode: Normal
  Reading date: 13/01/2021
  Thesis director: CLARAMUNT BLANES, JOSEP | PARDAL MARCH, CRISTINA
  

  Committee:
       PRESIDENT: ROSELL AMIGÓ, JUAN RAMON
       SECRETARI: FORMOSA MITJANS, JOAN
       VOCAL NO PRESENCIAL: ACUÑA RELLO, LUIS
  Thesis abstract: The natural fibers that come from vegetable origin have become a potential and competitive option as a reinforcement composite based on cement. This is due to their high resistance and low cost features, and also their high availability as a renewable resource.The intent of this thesis is to develop durable and strain hardening cementitious composites based on calcium aluminate cement -CAC- with variable metakaolin -MK- content -from 0 to 50 wt%- and flax non-woven natural textile reinforcement. In the research experiments performed the effects of metakaolin -MK- on the mechanical performance and cement mixture microstructure of the matrix; the effect of the cement mixture on the performance of the natural fibers; and the bending behavior and durability of the composites were evaluated.The composites obtained revealed that the admixture of low metakaolin content helps increase the composites durability without causing a significant decrease in the mechanical performance, it was also found that the addition of calcium aluminate -CAC- guarantees a better resistance and behavior when compared to Portland Cement.The evaluation of the effects on these matrices based on CAC in the vegetable fiber reinforcement showed that the matrices CAC could be an alternative to Portland Cement because of the vegetable fiber reinforcement durability. Nevertheless, the high cost of CAC obligates the use of an admixture to diminish the amount of cement.
  

Last update: 28/09/2021 05:10:27.

Research groups

• AIEM-Architecture, energy and environment
• FORM+-Research Group FORM+
• GAT-Architecture and Technology Group
• GICITED-Interdisciplinary Group on Building Scienceand and Technology
• LiTA-Architectural Innovation and Technology Laboratory
• REARQ-Rehabilitation and Architectural Restoration
• TECTEX-Textile Technology Research Group

Teachers

• Albareda Valls, Albert
• Bosch Gonzalez, Montserrat
• Claramunt Blanes, Jose
• Coloma Picó, Eloi
• Cornado Bardon, Cossima
• Fernandez Carrasco, Lucia
• Franco Gonzalez, Fidel
• Garcia Carrera, David
• Gomez Soberon, Jose Manuel
• Gonzalez Barroso, Josep Maria
• Haurie Ibarra, Laia
• Lacasta Palacio, Ana Maria
• Lopez Almansa, Francisco
• Moya Ferrer, Luis
• Muros Alcojor, Adrian
• Navarro Ezquerra, Antonia
• Onecha Perez, Ana Belen
• Palumbo Fernandez, Mariana
• Pardal March, Cristina
• Pons Valladares, Oriol
• Rodriguez Cantalapiedra, Inmaculada
• Rosell Amigo, Joan Ramon
• Zamora Mestre, Joan Lluis

• Andre Sanchez, Michel
• Avellaneda Diaz-Grande, Jaume
• Boixader Ibañez, Dionis
• Botton Halfon, Jocelyne Mireille de
• Casas Portet, Anna
• Crespo Sanchez, Eva
• Daumal Domenech, Francesc de Paula
• Diaz Gomez, Cèsar
• Garcia Almirall, Maria Pilar
• Gimferrer Vilaplana, Xavier
• Giraldo Forero, Maria del Pilar
• Gomez Serrano, Jose
• Gonzalez Moreno-Navarro, Jose Luis
• Graus Rovira, Ramon
• Llorens Duran, Josep Ignasi de
• Maristany Carreras, Jordi
• Marti Casanovas, Miquel
• Masseck, Torsten
• Moya Sala, Joaquim Narcis
• Muñoz Blanc, Carlos
• Nikolic, Jelena
• Paricio Ansuategui, Ignacio de L.
• Ramos Galino, Fernando Juan
• Ravetllat Mira, Pere Joan
• Roca Blanch, Estanislau
• Rosell Amigo, Joan Ramon
• Roset Calzada, Jaime
• Sastre Sastre, Ramon