Access profile

Profile of ideal applicant:

• Architects
• Technical architects
• Engineers in the construction sector: civil, roadway, canal and port, industrial, etc.

Profile of second-best applicant:

• Archaeologists
• Historians
• Economists
• Lawyers
• Scientists

The master’s programmes that lead into this doctoral programme are those offered by the UPC in the fields of architecture and construction. In cases in which applicants have completed other official master’s-level study programmes that provide advanced specialised or multidisciplinary training, at this or another university, and are focused on enabling students to complete research and professional work and are recognised as programmes that prepare students to undertake doctoral-level studies, the applicants will have to provide additional information about the corresponding study programme in order to decide whether or not any additional coursework will have to be completed, according to current legal limits (see the “Bridging Courses” section).

Output profile

Doctoral candidates who complete a doctoral degree will have acquired the following competencies, which are needed to carry out quality research (Royal Decree 99/2011, of 28 January, which regulates official doctoral studies):

a) A systematic understanding of the field of study and a mastery of the research skills and methods related to the field.
b) An ability to conceive, design or create, put into practice and adopt a substantial process of research or creation.
c) An ability to contribute to pushing back the frontiers of knowledge through original research.
d) A capacity for critical analysis and an ability to assess and summarise new and complex ideas.
e) An ability to communicate with the academic and scientific community and with society in general as regards their fields of knowledge in the manner and languages that are typical of the international scientific community to which they belong.
f) An ability to foster scientific, technological, social, artistic and cultural progress in academic and professional contexts within a knowledge-based society.

The award of a doctoral degree must equip the graduate for work in a variety of settings, especially those requiring creativity and innovation. Doctoral graduates must have at least acquired the personal skills needed to:

a) Develop in contexts in which there is little specific information.
b) Find the key questions that must be answered to solve a complex problem.
c) Design, create, develop and undertake original, innovative projects in their field.
d) Work as part of a team and independently in an international or multidisciplinary context.
e) Integrate knowledge, deal with complexity and make judgements with limited information.
f) Offer criticism on and intellectually defend solutions.

Finally, with respect to competencies, doctoral students must:
a) have acquired advanced knowledge at the frontier of their discipline and demonstrated, in the context of internationally recognised scientific research, a deep, detailed and well-grounded understanding of theoretical and practical issues and scientific methodology in one or more research fields;
b) have made an original and significant contribution to scientific research in their field of expertise that has been recognised as such by the international scientific community;
c) have demonstrated that they are capable of designing a research project that serves as a framework for carrying out a critical analysis and assessment of imprecise situations, in which they are able to apply their contributions, expertise and working method to synthesise new and complex ideas that yield a deeper knowledge of the research context in which they work;
d) have developed sufficient autonomy to set up, manage and lead innovative research teams and projects and scientific collaborations (both national and international) within their subject area, in multidisciplinary contexts and, where appropriate, with a substantial element of knowledge transfer;
e) have demonstrated that they are able to carry out their research activity in a socially responsible manner and with scientific integrity;
f) have demonstrated, within their specific scientific context, that they are able to make cultural, social or technological advances and promote innovation in all areas within a knowledge-based society;
g) have demonstrated that they are able to participate in scientific discussions at the international level in their field of expertise and disseminate the results of their research activity to audiences of all kinds.

Number of places

12

Duration of studies and dedication regime

Duration
The maximum period of study for full-time doctoral studies is three years, counted from the date of admission to the programme to the date of submission of the doctoral thesis. The academic committee of the doctoral programme may authorise a doctoral candidate to pursue doctoral studies on a part-time basis. In this case, the maximum period of study is five years, counting from the date of admission to the programme to the date of submission of the doctoral thesis. For calculating these periods, the date of admission is considered to be the date of the first enrolment for tutorials, and the date of submission the moment in which the Doctoral School officially deposits the doctoral thesis.

For full-time doctoral candidates, the minimum period of study is two years, counted from the date of an applicant's admission to the programme until the date on which the doctoral thesis is deposited; for part-time doctoral candidates it is four years. When there are justified grounds for doing so, and the thesis supervisor and academic tutor have given their authorisation, doctoral candidates may request that the academic committee of their doctoral programme exempt them from the minimum period of study requirement.

The calculation of periods of study will not include periods of absence due to illness, pregnancy or any other reason provided for in the regulations in force. Students who find themselves in any of these circumstances must notify the academic committee of the doctoral programme, which, where appropriate, must inform the Doctoral School. Doctoral candidates may also temporarily withdraw from the programme for up to one year, and this period may be extended for an additional year. Doctoral candidates who wish to interrupt their studies must submit a justified request to the academic committee of the doctoral programme, which will decide whether or not to approve the request. Each programme will establish conditions for readmission to doctoral studies.

Extension
If full-time doctoral candidates have not applied to deposit their thesis by the end of the three-year period of study, the academic committee of the programme may authorise an extension of up to one year. In exceptional circumstances, a further one-year extension may be granted, subject to the conditions established by the corresponding doctoral programme. In the case of part-time doctoral candidates, an extension of two years may be authorised. In both cases, in exceptional circumstances a further one-year extension may be granted by the Doctoral School's Standing Committee, upon the submission of a reasoned application by the academic committee of the doctoral programme.

Dismissal from the doctoral programme
A doctoral candidate may be dismissed from a doctoral programme for the following reasons:

• The doctoral candidate submitting a justified application to withdraw from the programme.
• The maximum period of study and of extensions thereof ending.
• The doctoral candidate not having enrolled every academic year (unless he or she has been authorised to temporarily withdraw).
• The doctoral candidate failing two consecutive assessments.
• The doctoral candidate having disciplinary proceedings filed against him or her that rule that he or she must be dismissed from the UPC.

Dismissal from the programme implies that doctoral candidates cannot continue studying at the UPC and the closing of their academic record. This notwithstanding, they may apply to the academic committee of the programme for readmission and the committee must reevaluate them in accordance with the criteria established in the regulations.

Organization

• Lacasta Palacio, Ana Maria

• Claramunt Blanes, Jose
• Cornado Bardon, Cossima
• Garcia Carrera, David
• Lacasta Palacio, Ana Maria
• Muros Alcojor, Adrian
• Onecha Perez, Ana Belen
• Rosell Amigo, Joan Ramon
• Zamora Mestre, Joan Lluis

• Department of Architectural Technology (PROMOTORA)

Secretary of the doctoral programmes in Architecture
Tel.: 934 011 875
Secretariadoctorat.utgab@upc.edu

Access profile

Profile of ideal applicant:

• Architects
• Technical architects
• Engineers in the construction sector: civil, roadway, canal and port, industrial, etc.

Profile of second-best applicant:

• Archaeologists
• Historians
• Economists
• Lawyers
• Scientists

The master’s programmes that lead into this doctoral programme are those offered by the UPC in the fields of architecture and construction. In cases in which applicants have completed other official master’s-level study programmes that provide advanced specialised or multidisciplinary training, at this or another university, and are focused on enabling students to complete research and professional work and are recognised as programmes that prepare students to undertake doctoral-level studies, the applicants will have to provide additional information about the corresponding study programme in order to decide whether or not any additional coursework will have to be completed, according to current legal limits (see the “Bridging Courses” section).

Access requirements

Applicants must hold a Spanish bachelor’s degree or equivalent and a Spanish master’s degree or equivalent, provided they have completed a minimum of 300 ECTS credits on the two degrees (Royal Decree 43/2015, of 2 February)

In addition, the following may apply:

• Holders of an official degree awarded by a university in Spain or any other country in the European Higher Education Area, pursuant to the provisions of Article 16 of Royal Decree 1393/2007, of 29 October, which establishes official university course regulations, who have completed a minimum of 300 ECTS credits on official university degrees, of which at least 60 must be at the master's degree level.
• Holders of an official Spanish bachelor’s degree comprising at least 300 credits, as provided for by EU regulations. Holder of degrees of this kind must complete bridging courses unless the curriculum of the bachelor’s degree in question included research training credits equivalent in value to those which would be earned on a master's degree.
• Holders of an official university qualification who, having passed the entrance examination for specialised medical training, have completed at least two years of a training course leading to an official degree in a health-sciences specialisation.
• Holders of a degree issued under a foreign education system. In these cases, homologation is not required, but the UPC must verify that the degree certifies a level of training equivalent to an official Spanish master's degree and qualifies the holder for admission to doctoral studies in the country where it was issued. Admission on this basis does not imply homologation of the foreign degree or its recognition for any purpose other than admission to doctoral studies.
• Holders of a Spanish doctoral qualification issued under previous university regulations.

Note 1: Doctoral studies entrance regulations for holders of an undergraduate degree awarded before the introduction of the EHEA (CG 47/02 2014)

Note 2: Governing Council Decision 64/2014, which approves the procedure and criteria for assessing the fulfilment of academic admission requirements for doctoral studies by holders of non-homologated foreign degrees (CG 25/03 2014)

Admission criteria and merits assessment

In order to study in a doctoral programme, the programme’s Academic Committee must first grant applicants admission. Specific admission requirements are as follows:

Training complements

Bridging courses will be defined based on the aforementioned applicant profiles, and are as follows:

Ideal applicant: university professionals who habitually participate in the technical processes involved with architecture, building construction and urbanism, as architects, surveyors or engineers in the construction sector.

These professionals will not be required to take bridging courses if they have previously completed one of the master’s programmes that lead up to this doctoral programme. Otherwise, they will have to complete the master’s-level coursework suggested by the programme’s Academic Committee.

Second-best applicant: professionals that occasionally collaborate on architectural projects, such as archaeologists, historians, economists, lawyers and scientists.

These professionals will not be required to take bridging courses if they have previously completed one of the master’s programmes that lead up to this doctoral programme. Otherwise, they will have to complete the master’s-level coursework suggested by the programme’s Academic Committee.

Candidates who, while carrying out their research plan, show a lack of specific instrumental training, may be required by their supervisor to complete additional educational and/or training activities from the list of courses offered by the University for doctoral candidates, in line with the UPC’s Doctoral School.

Enrolment period for new doctoral students

Candidates’ first enrolment will take place during the time indicated on the admission decision.

More information at the registration section for new doctoral students

Enrolment period

In the first half of October.

More information at the general registration section

Procedure for the preparation and defense of the research plan

Doctoral candidates must submit a research plan, which will be included in their doctoral student activity report, before the end of the first year. The plan may be improved over the course of the doctoral degree. It must be endorsed by the tutor and the supervisor, and it must include the method that is to be followed and the aims of the research.

At least one of these annual assessments will include a public presentation and defence of the research plan and work done before a committee composed of three doctoral degree holders, which will be conducted in the manner determined by each academic committee. The examination committee awards a Pass or Fail mark. A Pass mark is a prerequisite for continuing on the doctoral programme. Doctoral candidates awarded a Fail mark must submit a new research plan for assessment by the academic committee of the doctoral programme within six months.

The committee assesses the research plan every year, in addition to all of the other activities in the doctoral student activity report. Doctoral candidates who are awarded two consecutive Fail marks for the research plan will be obliged to definitely withdraw from the programme.

If they change the subject of their thesis, they must submit a new research plan.

Formation activities

Activity: Tutorial.
Hours: 288.
Compulsory.

Activity: Study trips.
Hours: 80.
Optional.

Activity: Stays at businesses or with collaborators.
Hours: 480.
Optional.

Activity: Attending conferences.
Hours: 288.
Optional.

Activity: Mobility.
Hours: 480.
Optional.

Activity: Assessment based on doctoral student activity report (DAD) and research plan.
Hours: 4.
Compulsory.

Activity: Training in information skills.
Hours: 1.5
Optional.

Activity: Research methodology.
Hours: 12.
Optional.

Activity: Innovation and creativity.
Hours: 8.
Optional.

Activity: Language and communication skills.
Hours: 18.
Optional.

Activity: Workshops.

Activity: Publications.
Hours: 80.
Compulsory.
Before submitting their theses, candidates must have at least one publication.

Procedure for assignment of tutor and thesis director

The academic committee of the doctoral programme assigns a thesis supervisor to each doctoral candidate when they are admitted or enrol for the first time, taking account of the thesis supervision commitment referred to in the admission decision.

The thesis supervisor will ensure that training activities carried out by the doctoral candidate are coherent and suitable, and that the topic of the candidate’s doctoral thesis will have an impact and make a novel contribution to knowledge in the relevant field. The thesis supervisor will also guide the doctoral candidate in planning the thesis and, if necessary, tailoring it to any other projects or activities undertaken. The thesis supervisor will generally be a UPC professor or researcher who holds a doctoral degree and has documented research experience. This includes PhD-holding staff at associated schools (as determined by the Governing Council) and UPC-affiliated research institutes (in accordance with corresponding collaboration and affiliation agreements). When thesis supervisors are UPC staff members, they also act as the doctoral candidate’s tutor.

PhD holders who do not meet these criteria (as a result of their contractual relationship or the nature of the institution to which they are attached) must be approved by the UPC Doctoral School's Standing Committee in order to participate in a doctoral programme as researchers with documented research experience.

The academic committee of the doctoral programme may approve the appointment of a PhD-holding expert who is not a UPC staff member as a candidate’s thesis supervisor. In such cases, the prior authorisation of the UPC Doctoral School's Standing Committee is required. A UPC staff member who holds a doctoral degree and has documented research experience must also be proposed to act as a co-supervisor, or as the doctoral candidate’s tutor if one has not been assigned.

A thesis supervisor may step down from this role if there are justified reasons (recognised as valid by the committee) for doing so. If this occurs, the academic committee of the doctoral programme will assign the doctoral candidate a new thesis supervisor.

Provided there are justified reasons for doing so, and after hearing any relevant input from the doctoral candidate, the academic committee of the doctoral programme may assign a new thesis supervisor at any time during the period of doctoral study.

If there are academic reasons for doing so (an interdisciplinary topic, joint or international programmes, etc.) and the academic committee of the programme gives its approval, an additional thesis supervisor may be assigned. Supervisors and co-supervisors have the same responsibilities and academic recognition.

The maximum number of supervisors of a doctoral thesis is two: a supervisor and a co-supervisor.

For theses carried out under a cotutelle agreement or as part of an Industrial Doctorate, if necessary and if the agreement foresees it this maximum number of supervisors may not apply. This notwithstanding, the maximum number of supervisors belonging to the UPC is two.

More information at the PhD theses section

Permanence

The academic committee of the programme may authorise an extension of up to one year for full-time doctoral candidates who have not applied to deposit their thesis by the end of the three-year period of study, in the terms outlined in the Academic Regulations for Doctoral Studies of the Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya. In the case of part-time candidates, an extension of two years may be authorised. In both cases, in exceptional circumstances a further one-year extension may be granted by the Doctoral School's Standing Committee, upon the submission of a reasoned application by the academic committee of the doctoral programme.

A doctoral candidate may be dismissed from a doctoral programme for the following reasons:

• The doctoral candidate submitting a justified application to withdraw from the programme.
• The maximum period of study and of extensions thereof ending.
• The doctoral candidate not having enrolled every academic year (unless he or she has been authorised to temporarily withdraw).
• The doctoral candidate failing two consecutive assessments.
• The doctoral candidate having disciplinary proceedings filed against him or her that rule that he or she must be dismissed from the UPC.

Dismissal from the programme implies that doctoral candidates cannot continue studying at the UPC and the closing of their academic record. This notwithstanding, they may apply to the academic committee of the programme for readmission and the committee must reevaluate them in accordance with the criteria established in the regulations.

International Mention

The doctoral degree certificate may include International Doctorate mention. In this case, the doctoral candidate must meet the following requirements:

a) During the period of study leading to the award of the doctoral degree, the doctoral candidate must have spent at least three months at a respected higher education institution or research centre outside Spain to complete courses or do research work. The stays and activities carried out must be endorsed by the thesis supervisor and authorised by the academic committee of the programme. The candidate must provide a certifying document issued by the person responsible for the research group of the body or bodies where the stay or activity was completed. This information will be added to the doctoral student’s activity report.
b) Part of the thesis (at least the summary and conclusions) must be written and presented in one of the languages commonly used for science communication in the relevant field of knowledge, which must not be an official language of Spain. This rule does not apply to stays and reports in Spanish or to experts from Spanish-speaking countries.
c) At least two PhD-holding experts belonging to a higher education institution or research centre outside Spain must have issued officially certified reports on the thesis.
d) The thesis examination committee must have included at least one PhD-holding expert from a higher education or research institution outside Spain who was not responsible for the candidate’s stay abroad (point a) above).
e) The thesis defence must have taken place on UPC premises or, in the case of joint programmes, at the location specified in the collaboration agreement.

List of authorized thesis for defense

• ARIAS HOLGUÍN-VERAS, PALOMA MAGDALENA: Reconocimiento y evaluación de la superficie de los vidrios smalti usados en revestimientos de trencadís
  
  Author: ARIAS HOLGUÍN-VERAS, PALOMA MAGDALENA
  Thesis file: (contact the Doctoral School to confirm you have a valid doctoral degree and to get the link to the thesis)
  Programme: DOCTORAL DEGREE IN ARCHITECTURAL, BUILDING CONSTRUCTION AND URBANISM TECHNOLOGY
  Department: Department of Architectural Technology (TA)
  Mode: Normal
  Deposit date: 25/07/2022
  Reading date: pending
  Reading time: pending
  Reading place: pending
  Thesis director: ZAMORA MESTRE, JOAN LLUIS
  Committee:
       PRESIDENT: GÓMEZ RAMIÓ, JÚLIA
       SECRETARI: OLONA CASAS, JOAN
       VOCAL: IGLESIAS CAMPOS, MANUEL ÁNGEL
  Thesis abstract: This doctoral thesis delves into the knowledge of Venetian glass known as smalti, a unique material with a long history whose main application has been as a tesserae of mosaic cladding. During the Modernism period architecture paid great interest to discontinuous coatings; techniques, such as mosaic, had a revival that came hand in hand with an interest in the materials that traditionally composed it, so the smalti is introduced in this context and also adapts to the new techniques that emerged in this period as the trencadís.The main objectives of this thesis were: to carry out a study to understand the surface characteristics of the material, to review its behavior as part of the trencadis coating and to understand the surface aging of the material. It is developed in two main parts in order to approach the subject from a global perspective. The first was made possible through the study of a set of current glass samples from one of the reference workshops for the manufacture of smalti; based on these samples, a study of their primary surface anomalies and a color characterization was carried out. This material, which is still manufactured today in an artisanal way, is characterized by allowing a wide variation of shades; with the use of a portable spectrocolorimeter a color catalog was made, using the CIE L*C*hº and CIE L*a*b* color spaces, as a tool that allows the subsequent identification and comparison of colors in non-industrialized materials.In a second part, using trencadis specimens made with smalti tesserae, the secondary and tertiary anomalies generated later during the coating process were identified and classified. Subsequently, durability studies of these specimens were carried out with accelerated aging tests that allowed periodic monitoring of the progression of damage to the specimens and the identification of the quaternary anomalies that occurred at this stage. Smalti has proven to be a handcrafted material capable of meeting the requirements of trencadis cladding; for its correct selection, conservation or restoration, a thorough understanding of the advantages and limitations it offers is needed. It was confirmed that the durability of this glass depends on an adequate protection of its surface, that it is crucial to make a correct initial selection of the pieces that present a lower amount of first anomalies and to use the face with the highest quality of the glass as the face side.Key words: smalti, coating, trencadis, color, CIELCh, CIELab, surface
  

Last update: 24/09/2022 04:45:16.

List of lodged theses

Last update: 24/09/2022 04:30:26.

List of defended theses by year

• LEDESMA HIDALGO, MARÍA GABRIELA: Passive mosaic energy optimization: toward free-running school buildings
  
  Author: LEDESMA HIDALGO, MARÍA GABRIELA
  Thesis file: (contact the Doctoral School to confirm you have a valid doctoral degree and to get the link to the thesis)
  Programme: DOCTORAL DEGREE IN ARCHITECTURAL, BUILDING CONSTRUCTION AND URBANISM TECHNOLOGY
  Department: Department of Architectural Technology (TA)
  Mode: Article-based thesis
  Reading date: 28/07/2022
  Thesis director: PONS VALLADARES, ORIOL | NIKOLIC, JELENA
  

  Committee:
       PRESIDENT: HAMZA, NEVINE AHMED AHMED
       SECRETARI: BOSCH GONZÁLEZ, MONTSERRAT
       VOCAL NO PRESENCIAL: PÉREZ LUQUE, GABRIEL
  Thesis abstract: Technic, economic, environmental, and architectural constraints in existing building stocks set an energy renovation framework not always compatible with passive strategies. In deep energy renovations, the first line of action ought to be the passive improvement of the building envelope. Nonetheless, building renovation strategies use energy metrics suited for conditioned mode rather than thermal performance in passive mode. The predominance of energy metrics is due to the belief that mechanical systems guarantee indoor comfort conditions. However, thermal comfort is a pressing challenge in spaces without local controls. Such is the case of classrooms in primary schools where children cannot regulate the indoor environment and have limited adaptation possibilities. It is best to foster a passive free-running operation in classrooms due to the occupants' higher sensitivity and preference toward environmental conditions. This thesis addressed the passive optimization in existing educational building stock in free-running operations, i.e., not relying on active systems to maintain indoor comfort conditions. Reliably predicting the performance of passive strategies is troublesome since it is a function of the building emplacement, materiality, occupancy, the range of renovation measures, and the sequence of interventions. Building-integrated agriculture systems improve the thermal performance of the building envelope while increasing food security, social cohesion and provide learning opportunities. The energy modelling of such strategies is not implemented fully in energy simulation engines and, thus, requires the inclusion of the plant's heat exchange in the building's thermal balance. Identifying an optimal renovation strategy requires holistic assessment models encompassing all sustainability dimensions and an iterative simulation process based on stochastic optimization algorithms. However, exiting optimization tools do not handle complex simulation routines like those required for building-integrated agriculture systems. This thesis is presented as an article compendium where each article develops a specific aspect of passive optimization for building stocks. The first article develops a reductive urban energy model tailored for free-running building stocks. This model was applied to primary educational building stocks in Barcelona and Quito with accurate results at the building and urban levels. The second and third articles address the assessment of building-integrated agriculture systems from a holistic sustainability perspective and an indoor comfort perspective. For the latter, energy simulation includes the plant's heat and mass exchange as a function of the crop's growth. A future article will present an integer-constraint optimization algorithm that finds the most suitable passive strategies for each surface in the building envelope based on their environmental exposure. This method and a proof-of-concept are presented in this thesis. This surface-by-surface optimization results in a passive renovation strategy mosaic tailored to each building stock.
  

• TORRES LONDOÑO, NATALIA PAOLA: Domos Desplegables. Método geométrico a partir de polígonos regulares
  
  Author: TORRES LONDOÑO, NATALIA PAOLA
  Thesis link: http://hdl.handle.net/10803/674741
  Programme: DOCTORAL DEGREE IN ARCHITECTURAL, BUILDING CONSTRUCTION AND URBANISM TECHNOLOGY
  Department: Department of Architectural Technology (TA)
  Mode: Normal
  Reading date: 13/06/2022
  Thesis director: SASTRE SASTRE, RAMON
  

  Committee:
       PRESIDENT: STEVENSON, CAROLINA MARGARITA
       SECRETARI: LACASTA PALACIO, ANA MARIA
       VOCAL NO PRESENCIAL: COCHO BERMEJO, ANA
  Thesis abstract: This research proposes a design method for deployable domes from the scissor-type system, starting from the geometry of regular polygons for its configuration. The geometry of the regular polygons inscribed in a circumference, allows to determine the general shape of an arch in the final state of the deployment, defining the number of necessary bars, the positioning of the holes, the distances of the points of articulation, the length of the bar and the necessary opening angle to obtain a specific geometry.Taking the arch as the main structural component for the configuration of domes, the proposed method allows to implement the correlated design with folding floor platforms and folding textile covers to achieve a simultaneous deployment between structure and enclosures.The study develops as part of the constructive viability, an assembly process based on the traditional system to erect arches and domes, that is, through the progressive semi-arches approximation from the floor, to midpoint, at a specific height, in this way, the advantage of deployable structures is used to raise the arches, optimizing assembly times and facilitating the execution method in deployable structures. The method viability and demonstration is verified through the construction of several scale prototypes developed during the investigation that expose the validity constructive, architectural and structuralFinally, the objective is to propose new spatial alternatives for deployable domes, through an interactive table that allows the user to explore different geometries of arches formed with the scissor-type system and applied to an enclosure with specific requirements for height, radius or length of bars.
  

• ZOLFAGHARI, SEYYED MOHAMMADREZA: Sustainability Assessment Model of Mass Housing's Interior Rehabilitation. Economic, environmental, and social impacts of interior rehabilitation scenarios in Iranian MHs. The case of Ekbatan, Tehran, Iran
  
  Author: ZOLFAGHARI, SEYYED MOHAMMADREZA
  Thesis file: (contact the Doctoral School to confirm you have a valid doctoral degree and to get the link to the thesis)
  Programme: DOCTORAL DEGREE IN ARCHITECTURAL, BUILDING CONSTRUCTION AND URBANISM TECHNOLOGY
  Department: Department of Architectural Technology (TA)
  Mode: Normal
  Reading date: 15/07/2022
  Thesis director: PONS VALLADARES, ORIOL | NIKOLIC, JELENA
  

  Committee:
       PRESIDENT: SIMÓ I SOLSONA, MONTSERRAT
       SECRETARI: CORNADÓ BARDÓN, CÒSSIMA
       VOCAL: HOSSEINI, SEYED MOHAMMAD AMIN
  Thesis abstract: The construction of mass housings (MHs) solved high demands for housing in urban areas in the 1960s and 1970s worldwide. After decades of continuous use and inadequate maintenance, these MHs have been censured due to their several social, economic, and environmental negative impacts. The mentioned MH¿s deficiencies require MH interior rehabilitation. In Iran, this rehabilitation is currently based mainly on traditional and conventional construction technologies and techniques, most of which neither follow sustainability requirements nor contemporary building standards. In this regard, selection of proper MHs¿ interior rehabilitation procedures, from a sustainability point of view, is a crucial issue that faces several challenges since this is a multidisciplinary and multi-criteria process. To overcome this challenge, several studies applied different building sustainability assessment (BSA) methods and tools. Most BSAs have various shortfalls such as (i) lacking a holistic approach, (ii) neglecting the involved stakeholders¿ satisfaction, and (iii) employing some predefined sustainability indicators some of which are not relevant or applicable for all projects. These BSA¿s shortfalls lead numerous researchers to develop individual models based on MCDM methods to fulfill their projects¿ objectives. The present thesis aims to develop a novel MCDM model based on the MIVES and Delphi methods for holistic sustainability assessment of interior rehabilitation of MHs. This MIVES-Delphi model relies on a comprehensive literature review, seminars composed by experts, on-site surveying, LCA, BIM, user- and expert-based questionnaires, bias reduction, and sensitivity analysis. The model was first applied to the Ekbatan MH case study, which is the largest MH in Iran. Moreover, the author has applied this novel model to assess the sustainability of four different interior rehabilitation scenarios, including three common rehabilitation scenarios plus an innovative one. Consequently, the new model has been validated and the most sustainable rehabilitation scenario has been selected. This validation proves that the developed model can objectively quantify the holistic sustainability assessment of interior rehabilitation in MHs in Iran by considering the involved stakeholders¿ preferences. Additionally, this model has flexibility, adaptability, and applicability for any type of interior rehabilitation procedure in MHs in different geographical contexts as well as different construction phases including design, construction, and rehabilitation. The specific results regarding the rehabilitation scenarios¿ evaluation disclosed that none of the studied three common conventional rehabilitation scenarios could either meet the minimum sustainability target value or serve as proper solutions for interior rehabilitation. On the other hand, the fourth scenario, with a global sustainability index of 0.71, could meet the standard minimum target. This proves a possibility for innovative rehabilitation processes to have positive effects on increasing the sustainability performance in MH buildings. This thesis aims to contribute to moving forward to more sustainable rehabilitation techniques for interior rehabilitation in MHs as well as moving towards more sustainable architecture and construction. Moreover, this thesis opens up opportunities for future research perspectives that could be (i) adaptation and implementation of the developed model to other MHs beyond Tehran in order to consolidate and strengthen the proposed model, and (ii) combination of the developed model with Fuzzy logic to reach a superior methodology. Keywords: MHs¿ interior rehabilitation, Common rehabilitation techniques, Advanced rehabilitation techniques, Sustainability assessment, MIVES, Delphi.
  

Last update: 24/09/2022 05:01:10.

Research groups

• AIEM-Architecture, energy and environment
• FORM+-Research Group FORM+
• GAT-Architecture and Technology Group
• GICITED-Interdisciplinary Group on Building Scienceand and Technology
• LiTA-Architectural Innovation and Technology Laboratory
• REARQ-Rehabilitation and Architectural Restoration
• TECTEX-Textile Technology Research Group

Teachers

• Albareda Valls, Albert
• Bosch Gonzalez, Montserrat
• Claramunt Blanes, Jose
• Coloma Picó, Eloi
• Cornado Bardon, Cossima
• Fernandez Carrasco, Lucia
• Franco Gonzalez, Fidel
• Garcia Carrera, David
• Gomez Soberon, Jose Manuel
• Gonzalez Barroso, Josep Maria
• Haurie Ibarra, Laia
• Lacasta Palacio, Ana Maria
• Lopez Almansa, Francisco
• Moya Ferrer, Luis
• Muros Alcojor, Adrian
• Navarro Ezquerra, Antonia
• Onecha Perez, Ana Belen
• Palumbo Fernandez, Mariana
• Pardal March, Cristina
• Pons Valladares, Oriol
• Rodriguez Cantalapiedra, Inmaculada
• Rosell Amigo, Joan Ramon
• Zamora Mestre, Joan Lluis

• Andre Sanchez, Michel
• Avellaneda Diaz-Grande, Jaume
• Boixader Ibañez, Dionis
• Botton Halfon, Jocelyne Mireille de
• Casas Portet, Anna
• Crespo Sanchez, Eva
• Daumal Domenech, Francesc de Paula
• Diaz Gomez, Cèsar
• Garcia Almirall, Maria Pilar
• Gimferrer Vilaplana, Xavier
• Giraldo Forero, Maria del Pilar
• Gomez Serrano, Jose
• Gonzalez Moreno-Navarro, Jose Luis
• Graus Rovira, Ramon
• Llorens Duran, Josep Ignasi de
• Maristany Carreras, Jordi
• Marti Casanovas, Miquel
• Masseck, Torsten
• Moya Sala, Joaquim Narcis
• Muñoz Blanc, Carlos
• Nikolic, Jelena
• Paricio Ansuategui, Ignacio de L.
• Ramos Galino, Fernando Juan
• Ravetllat Mira, Pere Joan
• Roca Blanch, Estanislau
• Rosell Amigo, Joan Ramon
• Roset Calzada, Jaime
• Sastre Sastre, Ramon