Theory and History of Architecture

COORDINATOR

Carabi Bescos, Guillem

CONTACT

Secretary’s Office for Doctoral Programmes in Architecture
Tel.: 934 011 875
Secretariadoctorat.utgab@upc.edu

https://etsab.upc.edu/en/studies/doctoral-programmes

This doctoral programme is designed for architects or graduates in the humanities, archaeology or fine arts who hold a master’s degree in architecture, archaeology or the humanities, identical or equivalent to the master’s programme offered by the Department and who wish to write a doctoral thesis on the history or theory of arts and architecture supervised by one of the professors from the Department. The creation of this thesis may require bridging courses be taken from the master’s programme, as the doctoral programme does not offer classes.

The thesis, on a novel subject matter or taking a new approach, supported by primary and secondary sources, drafted in Catalan, English or Spanish, on a topic involving the history or theory of art or architecture, will be carried out in two stages: the first, a year of research during which candidates will come up with a research plan that must be submitted to and approved of by a panel, and the second, the execution of said thesis. Thesis supervisors and the Doctoral Committee, along with two external reports, will assess and accept the thesis before it may be presented to an examination committee.

The department will provide candidates with access to the library and School databases.

General information

Access profile

Given the multidisciplinary nature of the scientific field of the programme, there are a wide range of degrees that qualify applicants for admission.

In general, the programme is directed at those who are interested and who, in addition to meeting the standard credit requirements, are prepared and have interest in carrying out research with assistance from the professors in the programme. Thus, preference will be given to applicants that have previously completed a master’s programme in a related subject matter and are interested in the lines of research considered in the programme, and who are mature, able to express themselves clearly and have research experience.

Specific admission requirements
To give more detail, applicants’ academic backgrounds must meet the following requirements:
Candidates must have completed undergraduate and master’s studies in architecture, geography, history, history of art or the humanities (or less similar fields such as archaeology, journalism, tourism, etc.) and must be interested in carrying out doctoral-level research in an area related to the theory and history of architecture, art and cities. Compliance with these requirements will be assessed by weighting the measures that follow:
• The appropriateness of applicants’ undergraduate and master’s background in terms of contents and performance.
• Level of maturity, measured via candidates’ explanations of their academic backgrounds, research interests and motivations.
• Previous research experience via collaborations and publications in which the candidate has participated.
• Similarity of the proposal with programme research groups’ and professors’ lines of work.
It is important that applicants’ academic intentions and interests line up with the areas and lines of research that are followed by professors in this doctoral programme.
You can find information about said master’s programme at the following link: https://www.upc.edu/es/masteres/estudios-avanzados-en-arquitectura-barcelona-mbarch.

The following requirements have also been established:

• Applicants must have command of Spanish and English; knowledge of other languages will be considered positively, as it allows access to a wide range of bibliographic resources.
• In order to define what bridging courses will be necessary for students to be admitted to the programme, the applicant’s background and research experience will be considered.

Output profile

Doctoral candidates who complete a doctoral degree will have acquired the following competencies, which are needed to carry out quality research (Royal Decree 99/2011, of 28 January, which regulates official doctoral studies):

a) A systematic understanding of the field of study and a mastery of the research skills and methods related to the field.
b) An ability to conceive, design or create, put into practice and adopt a substantial process of research or creation.
c) An ability to contribute to pushing back the frontiers of knowledge through original research.
d) A capacity for critical analysis and an ability to assess and summarise new and complex ideas.
e) An ability to communicate with the academic and scientific community and with society in general as regards their fields of knowledge in the manner and languages that are typical of the international scientific community to which they belong.
f) An ability to foster scientific, technological, social, artistic and cultural progress in academic and professional contexts within a knowledge-based society.

The award of a doctoral degree must equip the graduate for work in a variety of settings, especially those requiring creativity and innovation. Doctoral graduates must have at least acquired the personal skills needed to:

a) Develop in contexts in which there is little specific information.
b) Find the key questions that must be answered to solve a complex problem.
c) Design, create, develop and undertake original, innovative projects in their field.
d) Work as part of a team and independently in an international or multidisciplinary context.
e) Integrate knowledge, deal with complexity and make judgements with limited information.
f) Offer criticism on and intellectually defend solutions.

Finally, with respect to competencies, doctoral students must:
a) have acquired advanced knowledge at the frontier of their discipline and demonstrated, in the context of internationally recognised scientific research, a deep, detailed and well-grounded understanding of theoretical and practical issues and scientific methodology in one or more research fields;
b) have made an original and significant contribution to scientific research in their field of expertise that has been recognised as such by the international scientific community;
c) have demonstrated that they are capable of designing a research project that serves as a framework for carrying out a critical analysis and assessment of imprecise situations, in which they are able to apply their contributions, expertise and working method to synthesise new and complex ideas that yield a deeper knowledge of the research context in which they work;
d) have developed sufficient autonomy to set up, manage and lead innovative research teams and projects and scientific collaborations (both national and international) within their subject area, in multidisciplinary contexts and, where appropriate, with a substantial element of knowledge transfer;
e) have demonstrated that they are able to carry out their research activity in a socially responsible manner and with scientific integrity;
f) have demonstrated, within their specific scientific context, that they are able to make cultural, social or technological advances and promote innovation in all areas within a knowledge-based society;
g) have demonstrated that they are able to participate in scientific discussions at the international level in their field of expertise and disseminate the results of their research activity to audiences of all kinds.

Number of places

8

Duration of studies and dedication regime

Duration
The maximum period of study for full-time doctoral studies is four years, counted from the date of first enrolment in the relevant programme until the date on which the doctoral thesis is deposited. The academic committee of the doctoral programme may authorise a doctoral candidate to pursue doctoral studies on a part-time basis. In this case, the maximum period of study is seven years from the date of first enrolment in the programme until the date on which the doctoral thesis is deposited. To calculate these periods, the date of deposit is considered to be the date on which the thesis is made publicly available for review.

If a doctoral candidate has a degree of disability equal to or greater than 33%, the maximum period of study is six years for full-time students and nine years for part-time students.

For full-time doctoral candidates, the minimum period of study is two years, counted from the date of an applicant's admission to the programme until the date on which the doctoral thesis is deposited; for part-time doctoral candidates it is four years.

When there are justified grounds for doing so, and the thesis supervisor and academic tutor have given their authorisation, doctoral candidates may request that the academic committee of their doctoral programme exempt them from the requirement to complete this minimum period of study.

Temporary disability leave and leave for the birth of a child, adoption or fostering for the purposes of adoption, temporary foster care, risk during pregnancy or infant feeding, gender violence and any other situation provided for in current regulations do not count towards these periods. Students who find themselves in any of these circumstances must notify the academic committee of the doctoral programme, which must inform the Doctoral School.

Doctoral candidates may request periods of temporary withdrawal from the programme for up to a total of two years. Requests must be justified and addressed to the academic committee responsible for the programme, which will decide whether or not to grant the candidate's request.

Extension of studies
If a doctoral candidate has not applied to deposit their thesis before the expiry of the deadlines specified in the previous section, the academic committee of the doctoral programme may, at the request of the doctoral candidate, authorise an extension of this deadline of one year under the conditions specified for the doctoral programme in question.

Dismissal from the doctoral programme
A doctoral candidate may be dismissed from a doctoral programme for the following reasons:

  • The doctoral candidate submitting a justified application to withdraw from the programme.
  • The doctoral candidate not having completed their annual enrolment or applied for a temporary interruption.
  • The doctoral candidate not having formalised annual enrolment on the day after the end of the authorisation to temporarily interrupt or withdraw from the programme.
  • The doctoral candidate receiving a negative reassessment after the deadline set by the academic committee of the doctoral programme to remedy the deficiencies that led to a previous negative assessment.
  • The doctoral candidate having been the subject of disciplinary proceedings leading to their suspension or permanent exclusion from the UPC.
  • A refusal to authorise the extensions applied for, in accordance with the provisions of Section 3.3 of these regulations.
  • The doctoral candidate not having submitted the research plan in the period established in Section 8.2 of these regulations.
  • The maximum period of study for the doctoral degree having ended, in accordance with the provisions of Section 3.4 of these regulations.

Dismissal from the programme means that the doctoral candidate cannot continue studying at the UPC and that their academic record will be closed. This notwithstanding, they may apply to the academic committee of the programme for readmission, and the committee must reevaluate the candidate in accordance with the criteria established in the regulations.

A doctoral candidate who has been dismissed due to having exceeded the time limit for completing doctoral studies or due to an unsatisfactory assessment may not be Academic Regulations for Doctoral Studies Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya Page 17 of 33 admitted to the same doctoral programme until at least two years have elapsed from the date of dismissal, as provided for in sections 3.4 and 9.2 of these regulations.

Legal framework

Organization

COORDINATOR:
ACADEMIC COMMISSION OF THE PROGRAM:
STRUCTURAL UNITS:
  • Department of History and Theory of Architecture and Communication Techniques (PROMOTORA)
SPECIFIC URL OF THE DOCTORAL PROGRAM:
https://etsab.upc.edu/en/studies/doctoral-programmes

CONTACT:
Secretary’s Office for Doctoral Programmes in Architecture
Tel.: 934 011 875
Secretariadoctorat.utgab@upc.edu

Agreements with other institutions

On the international level, the programme has collaborated consistently over the last ten years, with professors from various doctoral programmes at the following institutions: Politecnico di Torino, Politecnico di Milano, the Department of Architecture at the University of Ferrara, Università di Roma La Sapienza, the University of Bologna, Università di Venezia (IUAV), the University of Trieste, the University of L’Aquila, Instituto Superior Técnico, UTL Lisboa, the Faculty of Architecture at the University of Porto, École Nationale Supérieure d’Architecture Paris-Malaquais, HafenCity Universität Hamburg, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki. Professors from various Latin-American universities also participate in the programme, including: Universidad del Litoral (Santa Fe, Argentina), Mackenzie Presbyterian University (São Paulo, Brazil), Universidad Federal de Bahia (Salvador de Bahia, Brazil), Universidad de Palermo (Buenos Aires, Argentina), Universidad Nacional de la Plata, UNC (Córdoba, Argentina), the Faculty of Architecture at the National Autonomous University of Mexico, etc.

Because of the lines of research associated with the programme, we have kept a close relationship with various institutions, such as the Historical Archives at the Architects’ Association of Catalonia (COAC), the Barcelona History Museum (MUHBA), the Centre de Cultura Contemporània de Barcelona (CCCB), Arts Santa Mònica and the Queen Sofia National Art Museum in Madrid. As per the stipulations in the new Decree, agreements have been set up with these institutions to incorporate them as external partners of the programme. The top two institutions, due to their regular collaboration with programme and because they have similar strategic research missions, are the Historical Archives at the COAC and the MUHBA.

Access, admission and registration

Access profile

Given the multidisciplinary nature of the scientific field of the programme, there are a wide range of degrees that qualify applicants for admission.

In general, the programme is directed at those who are interested and who, in addition to meeting the standard credit requirements, are prepared and have interest in carrying out research with assistance from the professors in the programme. Thus, preference will be given to applicants that have previously completed a master’s programme in a related subject matter and are interested in the lines of research considered in the programme, and who are mature, able to express themselves clearly and have research experience.

Specific admission requirements
To give more detail, applicants’ academic backgrounds must meet the following requirements:
Candidates must have completed undergraduate and master’s studies in architecture, geography, history, history of art or the humanities (or less similar fields such as archaeology, journalism, tourism, etc.) and must be interested in carrying out doctoral-level research in an area related to the theory and history of architecture, art and cities. Compliance with these requirements will be assessed by weighting the measures that follow:
• The appropriateness of applicants’ undergraduate and master’s background in terms of contents and performance.
• Level of maturity, measured via candidates’ explanations of their academic backgrounds, research interests and motivations.
• Previous research experience via collaborations and publications in which the candidate has participated.
• Similarity of the proposal with programme research groups’ and professors’ lines of work.
It is important that applicants’ academic intentions and interests line up with the areas and lines of research that are followed by professors in this doctoral programme.
You can find information about said master’s programme at the following link: https://www.upc.edu/es/masteres/estudios-avanzados-en-arquitectura-barcelona-mbarch.

The following requirements have also been established:

• Applicants must have command of Spanish and English; knowledge of other languages will be considered positively, as it allows access to a wide range of bibliographic resources.
• In order to define what bridging courses will be necessary for students to be admitted to the programme, the applicant’s background and research experience will be considered.

Access requirements

As a rule, applicants must hold a Spanish bachelor's degree or equivalent and a Spanish master's degree or equivalent, provided they have completed a minimum of 300 ECTS credits on the two degrees (Royal Decree 43/2015, of 2 February).

Applicants who meet one or more of the following conditions are also eligible for admission:

a) Holders of official Spanish degrees or equivalent Spanish qualifications, provided they have passed 300 ECTS credits in total and they can prove they have reached Level 3 in the Spanish Qualifications Framework for Higher Education.
b) Holders of degrees awarded in foreign education systems in the European Higher Education Area (EHEA), which do not require homologation, who can prove that they have reached Level 7 in the European Qualifications Framework, provided the degree makes the holder eligible for admission to doctoral studies in the country in which it was awarded.
c) Holders of degrees awarded in a country that does not belong to the EHEA, which do not require homologation, on the condition that the University is able to verify that the degree is of a level equivalent to that of official university master's degrees in Spain and that it makes the holder eligible for admission to doctoral studies in the country in which it was awarded.
d) Holders of another doctoral degree.
e) Holders of an official university qualification who, having been awarded a post as a trainee in the entrance examination for specialised medical training, have successfully completed at least two years of training leading to an official degree in a health sciences specialisation.

Note 1: Regulations for access to doctoral studies for individuals with degrees in bachelor's, engineering, or architecture under the system prior to the implementation of the EHEA (CG 47/02 2014).

Note 2: Agreement number 64/2014 of the Governing Council approving the procedure and criteria for assessing the academic requirements for admission to doctoral studies with non-homologated foreign degrees (CG 25/03 2014).

Legal framework

Admission criteria and merits assessment

Candidates must have a high level of knowledge to be admitted to the programme and to successfully complete the required research for their theses on time.
• Academic transcript (weighting: 15%).
• Personal contact via e-mail and telephone interviews (weighting: 30%).
• Motivation letter (weighting: 30%).
• Knowledge of languages (weighting: 15%). Value that could be changed depending on the kind of research that the applicant wishes to carry out.
• Research experience (weighting: 10%).

Training complements

The academic committee for the programme may require that doctoral students pass specific bridging courses. In this case, the Committee will monitor the bridging courses and set up appropriate criteria to limit their length.

The courses shall involve training in research, but in no case will candidates be required to enrol in 60 or more ECTS credits.

Upon admission, the Academic Committee will assign a supervisor to each new candidate, and for those who did not take the master’s programme in Theory and History of Architecture or the MBArch master’s programme in Advanced Architecture Studies-Barcelona specialisation in Theory, History and Culture, bridging courses will be assigned from these programmes.

The number and type of subjects ideal for complementing applicants’ training will depend on their academic backgrounds and the expectations expressed in their motivation letters.

Enrolment period for new doctoral students

First enrolment will take place after the admission decision, if it is issued after the general enrolment period.

More information at the registration section for new doctoral students

Enrolment period

Enrolment, generally, takes place during the month of October.

More information at the general registration section

Monitoring and evaluation of the doctoral student

Formation activities

Activity: Tutorial.
Hours: 288.
Compulsory.

Activity: Publications.
Hours: 200.
To be completed during the stage of drafting the thesis.
Optional.

Activity: Participation in research projects associated with the doctoral programme.
Hours: 120.
Dedication will depend on the similarity between research topics, but as a guide, will require a minimum of 10 hours per week during at least three months.
Optional.

Activity: Mobility.
Hours: 480.
Optional.

Activity: Assessment based on doctoral student activity report (DAD) and research plan.
Hours: 4.
Compulsory.

Activity: Training in information skills.
Hours: 1.5.
Compulsory.

Activity: Research methodology.
Hours: 12.
Optional.

Activity: Innovation and creativity.
Hours: 8.
Optional.

Activity: Language and communication skills.
Hours: 18.
Optional.

Activity: Courses and seminars.
Hours: 50.
To be completed at the beginning of training.
Optional.

Activity: Workshops.
Hours: 15.
Optional.

Procedure for assignment of tutor and thesis director

The academic committee of the doctoral programme assigns a thesis supervisor to each doctoral candidate when they are admitted or enrol for the first time, taking account of the thesis supervision commitment referred to in the admission decision.

The thesis supervisor will ensure that training activities carried out by the doctoral candidate are coherent and suitable, and that the topic of the candidate’s doctoral thesis will have an impact and make a novel contribution to knowledge in the relevant field. The thesis supervisor will also guide the doctoral candidate in planning the thesis and, if necessary, tailoring it to any other projects or activities undertaken. The thesis supervisor will generally be a UPC professor or researcher who holds a doctoral degree and has documented research experience. This includes PhD-holding staff at associated schools (as determined by the Governing Council) and UPC-affiliated research institutes (in accordance with corresponding collaboration and affiliation agreements). When thesis supervisors are UPC staff members, they also act as the doctoral candidate’s tutor.

PhD holders who do not meet these criteria (as a result of their contractual relationship or the nature of the institution to which they are attached) must be approved by the UPC Doctoral School's Standing Committee in order to participate in a doctoral programme as researchers with documented research experience.

The academic committee of the doctoral programme may approve the appointment of a PhD-holding expert who is not a UPC staff member as a candidate’s thesis supervisor. In such cases, the prior authorisation of the UPC Doctoral School's Standing Committee is required. A UPC staff member who holds a doctoral degree and has documented research experience must also be proposed to act as a co-supervisor, or as the doctoral candidate’s tutor if one has not been assigned.

A thesis supervisor may step down from this role if there are justified reasons (recognised as valid by the committee) for doing so. If this occurs, the academic committee of the doctoral programme will assign the doctoral candidate a new thesis supervisor.

Provided there are justified reasons for doing so, and after hearing any relevant input from the doctoral candidate, the academic committee of the doctoral programme may assign a new thesis supervisor at any time during the period of doctoral study.

If there are academic reasons for doing so (an interdisciplinary topic, joint or international programmes, etc.) and the academic committee of the programme gives its approval, an additional thesis supervisor may be assigned. Supervisors and co-supervisors have the same responsibilities and academic recognition.

The maximum number of supervisors of a doctoral thesis is two: a supervisor and a co-supervisor.

For theses carried out under a cotutelle agreement or as part of an Industrial Doctorate, if necessary and if the agreement foresees it this maximum number of supervisors may not apply. This notwithstanding, the maximum number of supervisors belonging to the UPC is two.

More information at the PhD theses section

Permanence

The maximum period of study for full-time doctoral studies is four years, counted from the date of first enrolment in the relevant programme until the date on which the doctoral thesis is deposited. The academic committee of the doctoral programme may authorise a doctoral candidate to pursue doctoral studies on a part-time basis. In this case, the maximum period of study is seven years from the date of first enrolment in the programme until the date on which the doctoral thesis is deposited. To calculate these periods, the date of deposit is considered to be the date on which the thesis is made publicly available for review.

If a doctoral candidate has a degree of disability equal to or greater than 33%, the maximum period of study is six years for full-time students and nine years for part-time students.

If a doctoral candidate has not applied to deposit their thesis before the expiry of the deadlines specified in the previous section, the academic committee of the doctoral programme may, at the request of the doctoral candidate, authorise an extension of this deadline of one year under the conditions specified for the doctoral programme in question.

Dismissal from the doctoral programme
A doctoral candidate may be dismissed from a doctoral programme for the following reasons:

  • The doctoral candidate submitting a justified application to withdraw from the programme.
  • The doctoral candidate not having completed their annual enrolment or applied for a temporary interruption.
  • The doctoral candidate not having formalised annual enrolment on the day after the end of the authorisation to temporarily interrupt or withdraw from the programme.
  • The doctoral candidate receiving a negative reassessment after the deadline set by the academic committee of the doctoral programme to remedy the deficiencies that led to a previous negative assessment.
  • The doctoral candidate having been the subject of disciplinary proceedings leading to their suspension or permanent exclusion from the UPC.
  • A refusal to authorise the extensions applied for, in accordance with the provisions of Section 3.3 of these regulations.
  • The doctoral candidate not having submitted the research plan in the period established in Section 8.2 of these regulations.
  • The maximum period of study for the doctoral degree having ended, in accordance with the provisions of Section 3.4 of these regulations.

Dismissal from the programme means that the doctoral candidate cannot continue studying at the UPC and that their academic record will be closed. This notwithstanding, they may apply to the academic committee of the programme for readmission, and the committee must reevaluate the candidate in accordance with the criteria established in the regulations.

A doctoral candidate who has been dismissed due to having exceeded the time limit for completing doctoral studies or due to an unsatisfactory assessment may not be Academic Regulations for Doctoral Studies Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya Page 17 of 33 admitted to the same doctoral programme until at least two years have elapsed from the date of dismissal, as provided for in sections 3.4 and 9.2 of these regulations.

Legal framework

Learning resources

With regards to resources, the support that our programme receives from University services and UPC libraries is significant and provides us with access to experts in information and documentation resources to thus prepare candidates with specific information and documentation techniques and tools.


Fundamental parts of this learning takes places in the following places:

• In computer rooms that are available to candidates.
• In the ETSAB library’s seminar room, where bibliographic and document collections can be worked with directly.

Doctoral Theses

List of authorized thesis for defense

NO RESULTS: there are no theses in this list.

Last update: 09/12/2025 05:46:24.

List of lodged theses

NO RESULTS: there are no theses in this list.

Last update: 09/12/2025 05:31:27.

List of defended theses by year

Loading...
  • GHAFFARI POUR JAHROMI, NEGIN: The geometry of vision: a comparative study of Persian architecture and miniature painting as a unified system (Ilkhanid and Timurid periods)
    Author: GHAFFARI POUR JAHROMI, NEGIN
    Thesis link: http://hdl.handle.net/10803/695415
    Programme: DOCTORAL DEGREE IN THEORY AND HISTORY OF ARCHITECTURE
    Department: Department of History and Theory of Architecture and Communication Techniques (THATC)
    Mode: Normal
    Reading date: 25/09/2025
    Thesis director: AZARA NICOLAS, PEDRO

    Committee:
         PRESIDENT: ESCRIBANO MARTIN, FERNANDO
         SECRETARI: GIMÉNEZ MATEU, LUIS
         VOCAL: PIRASTEH KARIMZADEH TABRIZI, SOHEILA
    Thesis abstract: This doctoral thesis explores the shared geometric foundations of Persian architecture and miniature painting between 1256 and 1550, spanning the Ilkhanid, Timurid, and early Safavid periods. It argues that both art forms are governed by a unified visual and symbolic system rooted in Persian cosmology and Islamic intellectual traditions.Combining historical research, visual analysis, and geometric reconstruction using tools such as AutoCAD, Illustrator, and Rhino, the study examines architectural structures (domes, iwans, courtyards) and miniature compositions side by side. Sources include architectural plans, treatises by mathematicians like Buzjani, Al-Biruni, and Al-Kashi, and illustrated manuscripts preserved in collections such as the Bibliothèque nationale de France.The thesis demonstrates that both architecture and miniature painting utilize similar spatial strategies—layered compositions, symbolic depth, and geometric order—eschewing linear perspective to create immersive, contemplative environments. It identifies recurring elements such as ornamental geometry, garden motifs, and architectural symbols across both media.Comparative case studies align miniature representations with real architectural sites, revealing formal and conceptual correspondences. These findings suggest that Persian visual culture operated as a coherent system where geometry functioned as both an aesthetic principle and a reflection of divine harmony.By bridging artistic and architectural traditions, the thesis contributes a new interdisciplinary model to Islamic art history and highlights the cultural continuity between intellectual, visual, and spatial practices in Persian civilization. The Geometry of Vision offers a new lens through which to understand how Persian visual culture articulates a unified geometry of space, symbol, and spirit.

  • GRATACÒS BATLLE, RICARD: La carta de l'hàbitat: aproximacions etnogràfiques i instruments d’estudi de l’espai habitat en el marc del novè CIAM d'Aix-en-Provence (1953)
    Author: GRATACÒS BATLLE, RICARD
    Thesis link: http://hdl.handle.net/10803/694225
    Programme: DOCTORAL DEGREE IN THEORY AND HISTORY OF ARCHITECTURE
    Department: Department of History and Theory of Architecture and Communication Techniques (THATC)
    Mode: Normal
    Reading date: 08/01/2025
    Thesis director: LLORENTE DIAZ, MARTA

    Committee:
         PRESIDENT: TORRES CUECO, JORGE
         SECRETARI: BITRIÁN VAREA, CARLOS
         VOCAL: ARDEVOL PIERA, ELISENDA
    Thesis abstract: The doctoral thesis revolves around the ninth CIAM (Congrès Internationaux d'Architecture Moderne) held in Aix-en-Provence in 1953. It focuses on the work presented by some European architects who were working in cultural contexts foreign to their own. Faced with the need to understand the “cultural other,” they incorporated into their work elements of ethnographic fieldwork. The main hypothesis of the research is that there is an ethnographic turn in the work of these modern architects, stemming from the necessity to approach the vital needs of a society different from their own.The CIAM IX took place in Provence to celebrate the opening of the Unité d'Habitation in Marseille the previous year, and on its rooftop, the 25-year history of CIAM was commemorated. The chosen debate topic was human habitat, with the primary goal of the gathering being the drafting of a Habitat Charter to complement the Athens Charter. The aim was to end the meeting with a solemn declaration proclaiming the right to housing for all human beings. The thesis explores the precise moment when the idea of working on a Habitat Charter was born. It reconstructs the “grids” presented by the CIAM groups from Algiers and Morocco, delving into the analytical study tools they used to understand the built realities of the Maghreb. In the context of profound transformations in international geopolitics following World War II, some architects and urban planners working in Morocco and Algeria were sensitive to the social and cultural realities with which they worked, developing studies, policies, and housing projects for Muslim populations. These architects adhered to the tenets of the functional city but adapted them to the specificities of the context in which they worked. They anticipated the industrialized future that Morocco and Algeria would achieve, participating in an economy of international exchange and acknowledging that they were working with a society in full transformation. For this reason, they aimed to develop a habitat capable of integrating into this changing society. We owe these architects the attention directed toward cities made of barrels and other industrial waste, as well as their insight that these constructed forms held lessons for modern architecture and the city.The doctoral thesis also addresses contributions presented at the congress focusing on the study of inhabited spaces in non-industrialized societies. The study and debate on the inhabited space of “primitive peoples” were represented by a group of young architecture students from the École des Beaux-Arts in Paris, who presented extensive documentation compiled after a long stay in Cameroon. In this context, some architects at the congress praised the lessons of architecture produced by “primitive societies,” which, without our industrialized technical skills, were able to shape their habitats through a singular worldview, a culture so balanced and just in meeting its needs that it appeared beautiful to the eyes of modern architects.The CIAM in Aix-en-Provence ended without successfully drafting the Habitat Charter. What remains from that time is a spirit and an energy from an era when architects and urban planners aspired to address the housing problem on a large scale. They were idealists who saw the need to collaborate with diverse disciplines, experimenting with ethnographic methods without formal training and approaching sociology to restore dignity to human habitats.

  • LIZÁRRAGA SÁNCHEZ, SALVADOR: Bacardí Tultitlán, México. Mies van der Rohe
    Author: LIZÁRRAGA SÁNCHEZ, SALVADOR
    Thesis link: http://hdl.handle.net/10803/694279
    Programme: DOCTORAL DEGREE IN THEORY AND HISTORY OF ARCHITECTURE
    Department: Department of History and Theory of Architecture and Communication Techniques (THATC)
    Mode: Normal
    Reading date: 11/04/2025
    Thesis director: GARCIA ESTEVEZ, CAROLINA BEATRIZ | ROVIRA GIMENO, JOSE MARIA

    Committee:
         PRESIDENT: MEDINA WARMBURG, JOAQUIN
         SECRETARI: GRAUS ROVIRA, RAMON
         VOCAL: SANCHEZ LAMPREAVE, RICARDO
    Thesis abstract: This thesis focuses on the office building for Bacardí y Cía S. A. in Tultitlán, Mexico, which Mies van der Rohe and his team designed and built from 1958 to 1961. Several Mexican companies – Knoll Internacional de México S. A., Constructora Maya, Campos hermanos and SACMAG de México– were involved in the process. For its construction, Mies’ architects –Gene Summers, Jan Lippert and Friedrich Wagner– made dozens of trips from Chicago to Tultitlán, while Mies visited Mexico only once. The thesis has two main objects of study. The first is the archive of the building, which contains about a thousand documents related to the Mexican building stored in the Mies van der Rohe archive at MoMA –hundreds of letters, telegrams, photographs, sketches and plans. The second is the architecture itself, whose peculiar materiality is contrasted with the information in the archive.The Tultitlán building is placed on the margins of the history of Mexican architecture, of Mies' history and, therefore, of Western architectural history. However, by extracting the object from that marginal position and forcing it to take a central position, it drags with it an entire architectural culture and forces the hegemonic discourses of those histories to reconstruct themselves, or at least to be questioned. The unprejudiced dissection of the archive and its building puts to the test historian Manfredo Tafuri's dictum that positioning oneself at “a particular angle of observation allows facts mute in themselves to be forced to become eloquent.” Among others, the archive forces us to place ourselves in the particular angle of vision of its secondary characters in order to understand them as principal and eloquent; from the foreshortening of a marginal city for the history of Western architecture that shows us that it became actually an international center; in the standpoint of a technological and constructive reality that allowed the materialization of a Mies building, but with methods different from those of a rich country; among many others. The research does not hide an inevitable conflict between the “historical word” of our present and that of the documents of another era -because the letters, plans, publications and films used in this research were created in a reality that no longer exists-. In other words, on the one hand, the documents were forced to speak in a language unknown to them –ours– and, at the same time, they were allowed to speak freely, without trying to hide their contradictions for the sake of a supposed historical or scientific congruence acceptable for the present. The collision of times forced to seek support in other languages, disciplines and characters –from Florence Schust Knoll and Lina Bo, to popular office cinema– to make intelligible the transnational context that allowed the existence of the objects of study of this thesis: the archive of the Bacardi offices in Tultitlán and its architecture.

  • LÓPEZ URIBE, CRISTINA: Arquitectura radical al dominio público. Juan O’Gorman, programa escolar, 1932
    Author: LÓPEZ URIBE, CRISTINA
    Programme: DOCTORAL DEGREE IN THEORY AND HISTORY OF ARCHITECTURE
    Department: Department of History and Theory of Architecture and Communication Techniques (THATC)
    Mode: Normal
    Reading date: 07/11/2025
    Thesis director: GARCIA ESTEVEZ, CAROLINA BEATRIZ | ROVIRA GIMENO, JOSE MARIA

    Committee:
         PRESIDENT: DEL REAL, PATRICIO
         SECRETARI: GARNICA GONZÁLEZ BÁRCENA, JULIO FIDEL
         VOCAL: GUERRERO LOPEZ, SALVADOR
    Thesis abstract: This dissertation focuses on architect Juan O'Gorman's 1932 program for the construction of elementary schools in Mexico City. The main subject of this thesis is the group of 26 new schools designed by O'Gorman and his team and included in the official book Escuelas primarias, 1932, published in 1933.Although Juan O'Gorman's work has always been present in the historiography of Mexican architecture—particularly his houses—the school program has been little studied. The schools mark a mythical moment in the history of Mexican architecture, in which the architect's social responsibility went beyond the artistic expectations of the discipline. The primary schools, with their extreme and radical rationality, were first rejected by select circles of architecture and then mentioned only superficially by historiography for decades, solely to point them out as a serious mistake. However, these buildings have acquired a mythical aura at certain moments in the history of Mexican architecture. Through a critical and thorough analysis, the thesis aims to bring to light some overlooked aspects of Mexican functionalist architecture, to open up other possible avenues of research, and to construct new interpretations of a specific moment in 20th-century history—the 1930s.The research is based on the analysis and activation of primary sources and archival objects—letters, photographs, bureaucratic documents, pieces of stucco, government memoirs, pigments, promotional brochures, etc.—and on the material reality of the buildings that remain: half of the schools that were built. But, in addition, for the first time, it is based on a series of documents that have come to light after being systematically hidden for decades—although others remain hidden.This analysis stems from the need to explain and unravel the multifaceted reality in which primary schools emerged in 1932. O'Gorman implemented various avant-garde strategies that he used simultaneously in both his best-known houses and schools. Likewise, the analysis reveals a series of coincidences in time that forged a network of political, artistic, social, and cultural relationships around the object of study.The research also analyzes the reasons for the initial rejection of the school program, which can only be explained in its complex political conditions. In turn, these conditions will be analyzed not only as part of a local context, but as interconnected with other far-reaching international conditions—which were political, cultural, and even religious. In this way, the archival material—and the historical phenomena it explains—reveals an intertwined history that requires us to go beyond national borders and show its various transnational relationships. Recognizing the unquestionable vitality and social utility that the schools demonstrate after almost a century in many of the neighborhoods where they were built, the aim is to recover the provocative nature of an architecture that was perceived at the time as too new. The schools were an expression of the rights that had been fought for in Mexico during the revolution and were the repositories of a new communal way of understanding education, in line with the ethical principles of the Mexican leftist intelligentsia. The radical architecture's strategies of rupture, carefully designed and implemented for the most sophisticated members of the Mexican cultural elite, would pass, through school projects, to socializing projects, to the masses and to the “anonymous” characters of the metropolis: girls and boys, mothers and fathers from the poorest neighborhoods learning to help and contribute to the community collectively. The avant-garde's cherished goal of having the masses truly embrace the new architecture may have come true—albeit briefly—in Mexico City in the early 1930s.

  • PEDRAGOSA BATLLORI, GEMMA: Santa Coloma d'Andorra: el projecte d'una església a l'Andorra d'abans del S.XI.
    Author: PEDRAGOSA BATLLORI, GEMMA
    Programme: DOCTORAL DEGREE IN THEORY AND HISTORY OF ARCHITECTURE
    Department: Department of History and Theory of Architecture and Communication Techniques (THATC)
    Mode: Normal
    Reading date: 21/11/2025
    Thesis director: GRANELL TRIAS, ENRIQUE | GINER OLCINA, JOSEP

    Committee:
         PRESIDENT: ADELL GISBERT, JOAN ALBERT
         SECRETARI: GARNICA GONZÁLEZ BÁRCENA, JULIO FIDEL
         VOCAL: DILMÉ BEJARANO, ENRIC
    Thesis abstract: The church of Santa Coloma d’Andorra belongs to one of the simplest and oldest architectural types of religious architecture: that of a single rectangular nave with a square apse. However, the simplicity of this type should not necessarily be associated with a straightforward or immediate construction or design.The aim of this study is to determine the extent to which the architecture of Santa Coloma follows a complex metrical design, which could only be achieved within a cultural context that, in Santa Coloma — located near two major cultural centres of the time, the Cathedral of La Seu d’Urgell and the Monastery of Sant Serni de Tavèrnoles — is highly plausible.In this work, architecture is used as archaeological material to analyse the key elements of the building’s architectural composition. Historiography has been reviewed, plans have been drawn up, the unit of measurement has been identified, and its dimensions studied in relation to the knowledge of proportion of the period and descriptions of biblical buildings. And it turns out that in order to conceive, design and build an apparently simple church like this, it was necessary to be familiar with the architecture represented in the Bible and with the arithmetical elaborations compiled by Boethius and Cassiodorus in the 6th century.We will therefore see a building which, although rural and seemingly modest, is the result of a layout and proportions based on a specific symbolic language, reflecting and documenting a body of knowledge and a way of applying it.

Last update: 09/12/2025 06:02:32.

Theses related publications

Encara no hi ha publicacions associades a tesis d'aquest programa.

Aún no hay publicaciones asociadas a tesis de este programa.

There are no publications associated with theses from this program yet.

Research projects

START DATEEND DATEACTIVITYFINANCING ENTITY
24/10/202330/11/2023Anàlisi crítica de les declaracions monumentals del patrimoni arquitectònic a Catalunya (dels anys 1866-2023)GENERALITAT DE CATALUNYA
01/09/202331/08/2026Reflexiones, desde Europa, sobre la arquitectura en España: proyectos urbanos, equipamientos públicos, diseño e intervenciones en el patrimonio (1976-2006)AGENCIA ESTATAL DE INVESTIGACION
01/09/202331/08/2027Cambio social y transformación urbana en la Barcelona obrera: las grandes transformaciones en el barrio, el urbanismo y la vivienda en el eje del Besós, 1920-1980AGENCIA ESTATAL DE INVESTIGACION
01/09/202331/08/2026Estrategias de evaluación e intervención para la regeneración urbana y la mitigación de la pobreza energética en Barcelona y Bilbao.AGENCIA ESTATAL DE INVESTIGACION
15/04/202330/11/2023Ciudad, Espacio Público e Infancias. Workshop de cooperación por la mejora del espacio público en torno a centros escolares de la Ciudad Oaxaca de Juárez (México).Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya; Centre de Cooperació per al Desenvolupament de la UPC
01/01/202331/12/2024Historia urbana: Análisis y representación de la transformación de las ciudades, siglos XIX-XXIMinisterio de Ciencia e Innovación
01/12/202231/12/2022Contracte de col·laboració per la reescriptura de guió per a la reducció de durada audiovisual Arquitectures de Bcn i adaptació Quadern de camp Arq. de BcnINSTITUT DE CULTURA DE BARCELONA
10/10/202231/07/2023“City and society”, participatory action-research in a vulnerable neighborhoodCentre de Cooperació per al Desenvolupament de la UPC
22/06/202222/08/2023Colllaboration contract to support the City of Bologna improve its understanding of the gender gap in existing public services and infrastructures through a technical assistance contract.OCA GLOBAL CONSULTING AND TECHNICAL
01/06/202231/05/2023Oficina de suport tècnic a la rehabilitació - Arquitectes de CapçaleraCentre de Cooperació per al Desenvolupament de la UPC
01/06/202231/05/2023“Ciutat i societat”, recerca-acció participada en un barri en risc d’exclusió. Estudiants del MISMeC a peu de carrer.Centre de Cooperació per al Desenvolupament de la UPC
12/11/202111/11/2025CÀTEDRA BARCELONA D´ESTUDIS D´HABITATGEPATRONAT MUNIC. DE L'HABITATGE
01/09/202131/08/2024Mapa de las colecciones de maquetas y réplicas del patrimonio arquitectónico español: entre la identidad nacional y la cultura internacional. Primera parte, 1752-1929AGENCIA ESTATAL DE INVESTIGACION
10/06/202126/07/2021Contrato de apoyo técnico para la Dirección y coordinación del conjunto de tareas para la candidatura de Barcelona como sede Congreso UIA 2026 y Capital de la Arquitectura UNESCO 2026CONS.SUP.COLEGIOS DE ESPAÑA
18/05/202130/06/2022Coordinació i disseny d’activitats entorn de les memòries de la lluita per l’habitatgeINSTITUT DE CULTURA DE BARCELONA
14/05/202113/11/2022Barcelona Ciutat FràgilAGAUR. Agència de Gestió d'Ajuts Universitaris i de Recerca
01/01/202131/12/2021Intervencions tàctiques a l'espai públic: una diagnosi participada basada en l'escoltaAjuntament de Barcelona
01/01/202131/12/2024Arquitectura, Ciutat i Cultura. Realitat i transformació de l'espai urbà contemporaniAgència de Gestió d'Ajuts Universitaris i de Recerca (Agaur)
01/12/202031/12/2020CENT ANYS D'ESCOLA INDUSTRIAL. ARQUITECTURA I HISTÒRIA (REEDICIÓ)Diputació de Barcelona
01/12/202001/04/2021Comissariat Exposició Guastavino, Rubió i Baldrich, arquitectes de l'Escola IndustrialDiputació de Barcelona
01/10/202031/07/2021Realització de 7 conferències i 7 workshops telemàtics impartits per diferents professors de l'ETSAB per a l'empresa pública BIAD de Beijing, a través de l'empresa Diagonal China.DIAGONAL ARCHITECTURE DESIGN AND CO
01/09/202031/12/2021Coordinació de les tasques a desenvolupar per part de l’Escola Massana com a subcontractista del projecte europeu Horizon H2020 “HELIOS: A Context-aware Distributed Social Networking Framework” segonsESCOLA MASSANA
01/05/202031/01/2021Estratègies de rehabilitació. Narrativa, sostenibilitat i hàbitat de la memòria construïdaGeneralitat de Catalunya. Departament de Cultura i Mitjans de Comunicació
01/09/201931/12/2022A CANON of Theatre Technical HistoryCommission of European Communities
14/01/201928/02/2019Redacció d’un guió per a un vídeo d’uns 8’ de durada sobre la història de l’arquitectura de Barcelona per al Museu d’Història de Barcelona. Localització i selecció del material gràfic amb el qual es pINSTITUT DE CULTURA DE BARCELONA
07/01/201931/01/2020Contrato de colaboración entre la Fundación ICO y la UPC para el Diseño de la Exposición Ideas de casas mediterráneas en el Museo ICO dentro del programa de actividades del área de arte para año 2019FUNDACION ICO
07/01/201931/03/2020Contrato de servicios entre la Fundación ICO y la UPC para el comisariado de la Exposición Ideas de casas mediterráneas en el Museu ICO, dentro del programa de actividades del área de arte en el 2019FUNDACION ICO
01/01/201930/09/2022Indicadores socio-espaciales para la mejora del parque habitacional en zonas vulnerables. Criterios de actuación en los casos de las Áreas Metropolitanas de Barcelona y BilbaoAGENCIA ESTATAL DE INVESTIGACION
01/01/201931/12/2021HELIOS: A Context-aware Distributed Social Networking FrameworkEuropean Commission
01/01/201931/12/2021Mujeres en la cultura arquitectónica (pos)moderna española, 1965-2000 = Women in Spanish (pos)modern architecture culture, 1965-2000Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación

Teaching staff and research groups

Research projects

START DATEEND DATEACTIVITYFINANCING ENTITY
24/10/202330/11/2023Anàlisi crítica de les declaracions monumentals del patrimoni arquitectònic a Catalunya (dels anys 1866-2023)GENERALITAT DE CATALUNYA
01/09/202331/08/2026Reflexiones, desde Europa, sobre la arquitectura en España: proyectos urbanos, equipamientos públicos, diseño e intervenciones en el patrimonio (1976-2006)AGENCIA ESTATAL DE INVESTIGACION
01/09/202331/08/2027Cambio social y transformación urbana en la Barcelona obrera: las grandes transformaciones en el barrio, el urbanismo y la vivienda en el eje del Besós, 1920-1980AGENCIA ESTATAL DE INVESTIGACION
01/09/202331/08/2026Estrategias de evaluación e intervención para la regeneración urbana y la mitigación de la pobreza energética en Barcelona y Bilbao.AGENCIA ESTATAL DE INVESTIGACION
15/04/202330/11/2023Ciudad, Espacio Público e Infancias. Workshop de cooperación por la mejora del espacio público en torno a centros escolares de la Ciudad Oaxaca de Juárez (México).Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya; Centre de Cooperació per al Desenvolupament de la UPC
01/01/202331/12/2024Historia urbana: Análisis y representación de la transformación de las ciudades, siglos XIX-XXIMinisterio de Ciencia e Innovación
01/12/202231/12/2022Contracte de col·laboració per la reescriptura de guió per a la reducció de durada audiovisual Arquitectures de Bcn i adaptació Quadern de camp Arq. de BcnINSTITUT DE CULTURA DE BARCELONA
10/10/202231/07/2023“City and society”, participatory action-research in a vulnerable neighborhoodCentre de Cooperació per al Desenvolupament de la UPC
22/06/202222/08/2023Colllaboration contract to support the City of Bologna improve its understanding of the gender gap in existing public services and infrastructures through a technical assistance contract.OCA GLOBAL CONSULTING AND TECHNICAL
01/06/202231/05/2023Oficina de suport tècnic a la rehabilitació - Arquitectes de CapçaleraCentre de Cooperació per al Desenvolupament de la UPC
01/06/202231/05/2023“Ciutat i societat”, recerca-acció participada en un barri en risc d’exclusió. Estudiants del MISMeC a peu de carrer.Centre de Cooperació per al Desenvolupament de la UPC
12/11/202111/11/2025CÀTEDRA BARCELONA D´ESTUDIS D´HABITATGEPATRONAT MUNIC. DE L'HABITATGE
01/09/202131/08/2024Mapa de las colecciones de maquetas y réplicas del patrimonio arquitectónico español: entre la identidad nacional y la cultura internacional. Primera parte, 1752-1929AGENCIA ESTATAL DE INVESTIGACION
10/06/202126/07/2021Contrato de apoyo técnico para la Dirección y coordinación del conjunto de tareas para la candidatura de Barcelona como sede Congreso UIA 2026 y Capital de la Arquitectura UNESCO 2026CONS.SUP.COLEGIOS DE ESPAÑA
18/05/202130/06/2022Coordinació i disseny d’activitats entorn de les memòries de la lluita per l’habitatgeINSTITUT DE CULTURA DE BARCELONA
14/05/202113/11/2022Barcelona Ciutat FràgilAGAUR. Agència de Gestió d'Ajuts Universitaris i de Recerca
01/01/202131/12/2021Intervencions tàctiques a l'espai públic: una diagnosi participada basada en l'escoltaAjuntament de Barcelona
01/01/202131/12/2024Arquitectura, Ciutat i Cultura. Realitat i transformació de l'espai urbà contemporaniAgència de Gestió d'Ajuts Universitaris i de Recerca (Agaur)
01/12/202031/12/2020CENT ANYS D'ESCOLA INDUSTRIAL. ARQUITECTURA I HISTÒRIA (REEDICIÓ)Diputació de Barcelona
01/12/202001/04/2021Comissariat Exposició Guastavino, Rubió i Baldrich, arquitectes de l'Escola IndustrialDiputació de Barcelona
01/10/202031/07/2021Realització de 7 conferències i 7 workshops telemàtics impartits per diferents professors de l'ETSAB per a l'empresa pública BIAD de Beijing, a través de l'empresa Diagonal China.DIAGONAL ARCHITECTURE DESIGN AND CO
01/09/202031/12/2021Coordinació de les tasques a desenvolupar per part de l’Escola Massana com a subcontractista del projecte europeu Horizon H2020 “HELIOS: A Context-aware Distributed Social Networking Framework” segonsESCOLA MASSANA
01/05/202031/01/2021Estratègies de rehabilitació. Narrativa, sostenibilitat i hàbitat de la memòria construïdaGeneralitat de Catalunya. Departament de Cultura i Mitjans de Comunicació
01/09/201931/12/2022A CANON of Theatre Technical HistoryCommission of European Communities
14/01/201928/02/2019Redacció d’un guió per a un vídeo d’uns 8’ de durada sobre la història de l’arquitectura de Barcelona per al Museu d’Història de Barcelona. Localització i selecció del material gràfic amb el qual es pINSTITUT DE CULTURA DE BARCELONA
07/01/201931/01/2020Contrato de colaboración entre la Fundación ICO y la UPC para el Diseño de la Exposición Ideas de casas mediterráneas en el Museo ICO dentro del programa de actividades del área de arte para año 2019FUNDACION ICO
07/01/201931/03/2020Contrato de servicios entre la Fundación ICO y la UPC para el comisariado de la Exposición Ideas de casas mediterráneas en el Museu ICO, dentro del programa de actividades del área de arte en el 2019FUNDACION ICO
01/01/201930/09/2022Indicadores socio-espaciales para la mejora del parque habitacional en zonas vulnerables. Criterios de actuación en los casos de las Áreas Metropolitanas de Barcelona y BilbaoAGENCIA ESTATAL DE INVESTIGACION
01/01/201931/12/2021HELIOS: A Context-aware Distributed Social Networking FrameworkEuropean Commission
01/01/201931/12/2021Mujeres en la cultura arquitectónica (pos)moderna española, 1965-2000 = Women in Spanish (pos)modern architecture culture, 1965-2000Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación

Quality

The Validation, Monitoring, Modification and Accreditation Framework (VSMA Framework) for official degrees ties the quality assurance processes (validation, monitoring, modification and accreditation) carried out over the lifetime of a course to two objectives—the goal of establishing coherent links between these processes, and that of achieving greater efficiency in their management—all with the overarching aim of improving programmes.

Validation

Monitoring

Accreditation

    Registry of Universities, Centers and Degrees (RUCT)

    Indicators